LOVE IT! symptom solvers not problem solvers!Another example of how we in America are a symptom solver and not a problem solver. The signs are probably erected to reduce liabilty.
"Well, mam, we posted a sign saying that the tires are hot. Now why did you let your kid play on the playground, knowing that the tires were hot? We warned you."
The interesting part is that IMO, they are exposing themselves to greater risk because posting the signs, informs us that Sandestin is aware of the problem, yet they still allow the playground to remain open, even though there is potential danger.
I recall a case where a thief won a bunch of money, after jumping a fence surrounding a property. The fence had many signs, warning would-be thieves of the danger of the guard dog. The thief was attacked and badly wounded by the dog, which in court, was proven to be purchased for the sole purpose of attacking thieves. The thief won based on the fact that the owner had posted the signs, basically admitting that the owner intentionally put the attack dog on the property to destroy any tresspassers. Had the owner not posted the signs, warning of the attack dog, it is likely that the thief would have walked away injured, and without substantial award from the jury because it would have been difficult to prove that the owner was aware that the dog was a vicious attack dog.
that requires not only intellect, but concern for one's neighbor. i have failed to see sandestin express through its actions any concern for residents or visitors. so to them...these safety issues are not problems. in their minds, the problem is that people are complaining! a sign doesn't solve the problem of hurt kids or an unsafe playground, and, like you said, it doesn't even protect them legally, but they aren't interested in any of the above. the symptom they wish to alleviate is residents or guests talking to them or asking them to do something.
the "beware of dog" anecdote is a PERFECT example of how that kind of thing plays out in court!