• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Is it nuture or nature?

New posts

futurebeachbum

Beach Fanatic
Or, put another way, government policies may not make the huge difference we think that they do....

Op-ed piece in the NYT by David Brooks called "The Limits of Policy" discusses this. From the article:

Roughly a century ago, many Swedes immigrated to America. They?ve done very well here. Only about 6.7 percent of Swedish-Americans live in poverty. Also a century ago, many Swedes decided to remain in Sweden. They?ve done well there, too. When two economists calculated Swedish poverty rates according to the American standard, they found that 6.7 percent of the Swedes in Sweden were living in poverty.

In other words, you had two groups with similar historical backgrounds living in entirely different political systems, and the poverty outcomes were the same.

A similar pattern applies to health care. In 1950, Swedes lived an average of 2.6 years longer than Americans. Over the next half-century, Sweden and the U.S. diverged politically. Sweden built a large welfare state with a national health service, while the U.S. did not. The result? There was basically no change in the life expectancy gap. Swedes now live 2.7 years longer.

Again, huge policy differences. Not huge outcome differences.
 
As a Swede, I don't think they are a good group to use for comparison because the differences between life in Sweden and life in the US are far too similar and policy did not matter much. Same climates, same foods, same culture, same genes, same work ethic, same religion etc.

Healthy active people who work hard and grow their own food aren't great for comparing poverty rates and medical care.
 
Last edited:
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top