• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Speaking of Drones

New posts
You may be right that the county can't regulate take-off and landing. If so, the drone lobby will probably see this thread and pounce!
 
Jimmy T said:
Drones are obnoxious and annoying. They are an invasion of privacy, property, and peace.
Click to expand...


10 by 10 tents that prevent others from using the 50% of the beach the BCC has allocated to us doesn't? Beach chairs & umbrellas are allot more obnoxious in my opinion than the steady hum of a drone. Used in the public domain (including free air space) wouldn't be a problem for me. Used to spy on or watch someone getting naked or makin whoopie would be a problem for me personally mostly because (trust me)...ya'll don't wanna see me show my a$$. LOL! :D:D:p
 
Kaydence said:
The article I cited was from the NWFL Daily News which simply said "drones will now be getting some regulation."

Again, I don't understand how they can regulate air space or even where they can take off from or land at, if that is guided by FAA rules.

Seems absolutely ridiculous to me the try and pass an ordinance that would prevent a drone of all things from being launched from the beaches yet allow 10 by 10 tents, gas grills and all those horrible beach chairs and umbrellas.

And maybe someone can tell me why the BCC wants to control all activity on the beaches but have no control when it comes to growth, infrastructure, traffic, the land development codes and comprehensive plan which most often are ignored and over population??

The word OVEReachhhhh still comes to mind.
Click to expand...
Next time get to your point on the first post instead of post number 20. I am interested in your info but jeez.
 
Jenksy said:
Next time get to your point on the first post instead of post number 20. I am interested in your info but jeez.
Click to expand...


Ya know @Jenksy you never have one damn thing positive to say about anything ever posted here.

Go read the freaking post again. I did make the point in my first post.

By the way, you don't answer questions very well either but you are sure quick to point out everyone's else's faults.
 
Good find. Thanks. Pretty much backs up what has already been said about it being unenforceable unless they have entered into some sort of agreement with the FAA which would be a stretch IMHO
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter









Share this page




                               
Back
Top