"Houses for around $400 per square foot..."
Wow - is that accurate Fisher? I had heard that the average sales price last year was closer to $600 per foot in Watercolor. I guess you have to be weary about information that doesn't come from the message board.
"Outside of that area, sellers will be very, very lucky to get over $500."
I asked a realtor today if what you were saying was correct. She pulled the results from last year which showed in Phase II and III of Watercolor, 15 sales that exceed $500 per square foot - 8 were $500+, 4 were $600+ and 3 were $700+. These were the result from a total of 34 sales last year. I thought you knew what you were talking about - but apparently not. By the way, she told me three more houses in Watercolor went under contract today. Sounds pretty encouraging
I see the comment about the crickets and no buyers. Any information on the number of houses under contract along 30-A? I've heard rumor that Watercolor has seen a spike in activity. Can anyone confirm?
Chill out, baby. Fisher never mentioned average price per sf. Please go back and read his post. My data shows you that 6 out of the 19 home sales in the last six months sold in the $400's per sf or less. There were some sales on the high end too. No need to get all huffy, and try to discredit my comment about fisher not being "totally off base." If you go back and read his comment, I think you will see that he wasn't totally off base, as he never mentioned avg sales price. ;-)SJ - the difference between $400 per foot and $563 per foot is only off about 29%. In my world, that gets you fired. Only on this board is it considered "not completely off base"