• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

How are you going to Vote on Amendment 1?

New posts
The forum in DeFuniak Springs was very well attended by the public. Approximately 150 residents showed up and several did voice concerns about spending levels of local government. Things that were learned at the forum:

During the property tax run-up of the last four years, Walton County BCC also has incurred an additional 20 million dollars in debt they we now must pay.

The tax run-up was used to catch up with all the buildings that we now have in both the north and south end. No other major buildings are planned but there is a need for the money that will be found as time progresses.

Amendment 1 will affect the school district approximately $400K per year. But we transfer more than $4 million per year from capital outlay taxes into the general operating fund. This $400k will, according to school officials, severely impact teacher salaries over the next four years.

No one in the north end understands how the SWFD is funded.

Some NO advocates repeatedly claimed that if this passes that we will see closures of fire stations and layoffs of emergency personell. County officials disagreed this would occur.

State Representative Don Brown personally supports the amendment.

Oh yeah, and the class size amendment is bad, very, very bad. I never really could understand what this had to do with amendment 1, but a lot of time was spent discussing how bad it was.

Overall, a very good session. Now to see if the citizens of south Walton are going to participate to the same degree when they do this in south Walton.
 
additional punishment to new buyers???:idontno:
Currently, buyers, looking to relocate to FL are paying some of the taxes, which are not being paid by the people who have already claimed homesteaded property. If the new bill passes into law, those people moving to Florida who buy their home, will now have to pay even more, because homestead deduction will be at double what it is now, plus, taxes will have to be made up on the $25,000 tangible property taxes for businesses and second homes, as well as that money being lost from the commercial caps. So, yes, there will be additional punishment to new buyers.
 
Currently, buyers, looking to relocate to FL are paying some of the taxes, which are not being paid by the people who have already claimed homesteaded property. If the new bill passes into law, those people moving to Florida who buy their home, will now have to pay even more, because homestead deduction will be at double what it is now, plus, taxes will have to be made up on the $25,000 tangible property taxes for businesses and second homes, as well as that money being lost from the commercial caps. So, yes, there will be additional punishment to new buyers.

Or government could just reduce spending.
 
Or government could just reduce spending.


When the American people stop asking for more than they can afford, then pressure will be off the government officials to cut back on spending.
 
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before in this thread or even if I have all of my info right, but, isn't the millage rate allowed to go back up after two years if this is passed? So it would only possibly offer small relief to some for the next two years?:confused:

That was my understanding when I listened to Mr. Pilcher during his visit to the DFS City council in Dec.
 
I'm not sure if this has been mentioned before in this thread or even if I have all of my info right, but, isn't the millage rate allowed to go back up after two years if this is passed? So it would only possibly offer small relief to some for the next two years?:confused:

That was my understanding when I listened to Mr. Pilcher during his visit to the DFS City council in Dec.

It is a Constitutional amendment and nothing like that is in the language. The millage can be raised several ways, but if they go over the statutory revenue caps the ways are more restricted. A small increase over requires a 4/5ths vote, a large increase requires a referendum.
 
When the American people stop asking for more than they can afford, then pressure will be off the government officials to cut back on spending.

People are never going to stop trying to live at the expense of others. Government leaders need to learn that they can get just as many votes and just as much respect by saying no, imho.
 
Do you honestly see that as a real alternative? It's about as real to happen as amendment 1 is to actually help anyone.


Just to give out more information, it was presented last night that based upon current Walton County millage rates, the maximum savings that you could get in Walton County would be $98. Substantially less than the $240 average being presented. We are very fortunate that tax rates are as low as they are in Walton County. But still, that is my $98, and I would much rather have it to do what I want to instead of others making that decision for me.
 
It is a Constitutional amendment and nothing like that is in the language. The millage can be raised several ways, but if they go over the statutory revenue caps the ways are more restricted. A small increase over requires a 4/5ths vote, a large increase requires a referendum.


Thanks for clearing that up for me. It was a bit of confusion for me where this was concerned :D
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top