Alicia Leonard
SoWal Insider
I am just not understanding WHY we can't be flagging these people as part of basic law enforcement or bureaucratic procedure. Not sweeps, not stings, not profiling, just enforcing the immigration status of people UNDER ARREST OR IN CUSTODY.
If they're breaking the law and being stopped/arrested or applying for public benefits, why is immigration enforcement not ever coming into play?
Building a giant fence is an incredibly stupid idea, but not as dumb as not enforcing the law when you have people in custody already. I can understand there being gaps in the database, but it should still be flagging people w/ expired visas etc.
Basically I'm thinking we don't need new laws, we just need to enforce the ones we have.
Short answer from the seven part series I wrote Scoot.
Because the feds don't want locals doing what they term is their job. Locally if you are pulled over you can be arrested or fined for no drivers license or maybe identity theft. First time they are arrested chances are there are no fingerprints on file and many names given are someone else's. ICE states on it's website that dangerous or wanted felon are always their first priority.
I have heard horror stories of people who have had an illegal use their name or social and then post bail. They are never seen again, but a few years down the road the person with the real identity is pulled over for a traffic stop and finds out they have warrants out in their name. Any other way of tracing or tagging someone is gonna be out there because most of these people know how to live under the radar. It may at first sound like a no brainer, in reality, it is anything but.
PS. You are right about laws on the books needing to be enforced. But, locally a person cannot be held for not having proper id. If they bail out for no drivers license then they are free to go if ICE doesn't tag their file. Because being in the country illegally is a federal offense not a local one.
Last edited:


