BCC Responsibilities???

[DFSboy]

Walton county Comprehensive Plan emphasizes the Preservation of such rare enviorments in Objective L-1.5 Policy C-3.2.11 states "The County.....shall identify and pursue the aquisition of that contain or are adjacent to such beach or shoreline ecosysystems. As you can see, the acquisition of the property would fulfill goals, objectives, and policies in the Future Land use, Recreation, and the Coastal Zone, Conservation Elements of the Walton County Comprehensive Plan.
The County is soliciting a grant from F.C.T, a part of all Counties in the state of Florida tax dollars go in to this fund. Therefore, all of Florida, the Counties seek to fund a park, etc. If Walton County does not try to secure the Grant, then I am sure that Dade County would be happy to have Walton County monies for their Park. Simple.

sometime,

Sounds really nice. Considering a financial budget, such as a family planning a vacation, maintaining and creating new expensive parks are NOT a "Bare bones budget." They said it, not me...

 

[sometime]

DfsBOY

I do indeed have a problem with higher taxes, but in this case it is not relevant. The money for the latest proposed park is pulled from a state grant which has been formed from tax revenue from every county for the past 14 years.

 

[DFSboy]

I do indeed have a problem with higher taxes, but in this case it is not relevant. The money for the latest proposed park is pulled from a state grant which has been formed from tax revenue from every county for the past 14 years.

sometime,

I say return the money back to each county, fairly, and then those counties can then return the monies back to the general fund. Heck, in cases like that, taxes just might really decrease. I would guess most people in Walton would rather see a significant tax decrease on their respective bill rather than all those fine properties being owned by the County.

Again, the BCC said they are planning a "Bare bones budget" for 2009. Many families here in Walton could probably teach them what REALLY that phrase means during these tuff economic times. They said it.....but really apparently really didn't mean it.

 

[Smiling JOe]

seagrovegirl,

Lots and lots of money on parks, for one. And how about the thought of the BCC purchasing that beachfront property some few months ago? Is either a legal responsibilty of the BCC? Think about it. "Bare bones budget," in their own words, as said a few days ago during a budget discussion. I, personally, don't see a real "Bare bones budget" with the BCC. Again, they are the ones that said it. Do they mean it?

I cannot think of one single park in this country to which I have been, that was a privately owned and ran park.

Parks can offer value to the citizens in a community. They are part of what builds community. They provide common ground to meet others in the community. They provide recreation for youth and adults, which may help to keep active users in good health, saving the gov't much in the way of healthcare costs. They help attract new people and businesses to this area.

In most cases of our local parks, funding is coming via grants.

Remember that sometimes, you have to spend money to get money. This might come in offering tax incentives, like Freeport has done, to businesses moving there. Businesses create jobs for people, people buy things, and the gov't makes up the incentives in the way of property and sales taxes. Not all gov't spending is bad, though some is wasteful, IMO.

Now the County considering purchasing a lease for use of undevelopable property, giving the recent buyers good profits, in a time where no one else is able to sell for profit, was just plain ridiculous, especially during this budget crunch. Why the County relies on only one appraisal to establish a purchase price, is also crazy. Fortunately, this time, they turned down the offer presented by the former County Attorney.

 

[organicmama]

sometime,

Sounds really nice. Considering a financial budget, such as a family planning a vacation, maintaining and creating new expensive parks are NOT a "Bare bones budget." They said it, not me...

Don't community parks ADD to the value of our area? I don't know about your situation, but I've got 3 little ones who love parks and run and play all day. Parks are GREAT community builders where people can meet each other & get to know other people in the area. A big complaint that was heard was that so much of the planning was going to towards tourism and not enough going towards what residents need, like parks. I don't want to have to drive 30-45 minutes for a decent park to play in or to meet other people.

And, BTW, it is grant money.

 

[DFSboy]

Don't community parks ADD to the value of our area? I don't know about your situation, but I've got 3 little ones who love parks and run and play all day. Parks are GREAT community builders where people can meet each other & get to know other people in the area. A big complaint that was heard was that so much of the planning was going to towards tourism and not enough going towards what residents need, like parks. I don't want to have to drive 30-45 minutes for a decent park to play in or to meet other people.

And, BTW, it is grant money.

organicmama,

Public parks are really nice, like owning a brand new car is. Yes they are "GREAT," I agree. However, they are NOT a "need," as you've claimed. Also, "grant money" originates from taxpayers pockets too.

Anyway, to everyone here: which is more important? paving a road in desperate need of repair or putting money in a park? Which should come first?

 

[seagrovegirl]

I'm all for parks, however Sowal has many public parks not to mention thousands of acres of State Forest. We should lay off the snapping up of public land until our tax base is stabilized. Not to mention, public lands are not on the tax rolls.

 

[organicmama]

organicmama,

Public parks are really nice, like owning a brand new car is. Yes they are "GREAT," I agree. However, they are NOT a "need," as you've claimed. Also, "grant money" originates from taxpayers pockets too.

Anyway, to everyone here: which is more important? paving a road in desperate need of repair or putting money in a park? Which should come first?

Well, I've never owned a brand new car. Ours are about 12 and 15 years old right now....:roll:

I agree that grants come from taxpayers pockets, too, but the grants for the parks aren't local ones, there is a bit of a difference in the burden. Which is more important? Both. Which should come first? Paving the road. The money, although essentially both from taxpayers, the road improvement would be local money & should be handled quickly & efficiently, although that rarely happens.

Both bring higher standards of living to the people living in our area.

 

[seagrovegirl]

No matter where the money comes from, they are tax dollars. People all over the country are struggling with the high cost of everything and it's time to demand fiscal responsibility of our elected officials, whether they are local, state or federal government. IMO, parks would be an irresponsible waste at this time economic hardship.

 

[DFSboy]

No matter where the money comes from, they are tax dollars. People all over the country are struggling with the high cost of everything and it's time to demand fiscal responsibility of our elected officials, whether they are local, state or federal government. IMO, parks would be an irresponsible waste at this time economic hardship.

seagrovegirl,

Wow! Finally someone sees the logic here. Thanks for your reply. You just might make a good County Commissioner someday. (??)