Candidates could have chosen to run as NPA, no party affiliation, and would have been guaranteed a spot on the November ballot.
I am still confused by Organicmama's statements. What race did you not get to vote in due to party politics?
wrobert, my guess is that organicmama is referring to the Sheriff's race. Yes, she will be able to vote in the general election for that race, but she didn't have a voice in choosing who she felt was the best candidate for the Reps, who is most likely going to be the winner in Nov. (did I just say that outloud?)
more like, 86 the damn clubs (lol) so everyone can vote for the best candidate. Then, we could have a runoff of the top two finishers. (my thoughts, not necessarily OrganicMama's)
wrobert, my guess is that organicmama is referring to the Sheriff's race. Yes, she will be able to vote in the general election for that race, but she didn't have a voice in choosing who she felt was the best candidate for the Reps, who is most likely going to be the winner in Nov. (did I just say that outloud?)
Regarding local politics, and in this case the primaries, the issue of parties is "funny" to me because I would like to be able to choose the BEST candidate and not have to fret over the fact that I can't vote for Joe Schmoe because I'm not affiliated with that party. I can understand that differentiation on the state and national level but not on this one.

I didn't get to vote for the Sheriff's race either because I'm independent. I'm not "politics-savvy" so I really didn't understand. If I'm registered to vote, why couldn't I cast a ballot in the sheriff's race? Mine and others' votes there may have made a difference in the outcome, no?![]()