• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

budget meeting

New posts
Are truly conservative notions such as less regulation and less intrusion into private citizen's lives going to be part of the equation? This would seem like the oportune time to effect real change in the direction of government.:clap:
So would be willing to give up services, or when road needs patching or repaved you won't mind running the ruts, or think of our employees we would be laying off, bet many live within the County and pay taxes also. When those bridges on 30a need to be replaced or repaired that may have to wait and our guest for which our economy is dependent will have to be detoured. Is that what you are in favor of?:eek:
 
So would be willing to give up services, or when road needs patching or repaved you won't mind running the ruts, or think of our employees we would be laying off, bet many live within the County and pay taxes also. When those bridges on 30a need to be replaced or repaired that may have to wait and our guest for which our economy is dependent will have to be detoured. Is that what you are in favor of?:eek:


No, I stated previously I hope layoffs and pay cuts would be the last resort. What I am getting at is moving government back to what it is supposed to do. On the local level, that is provide for public safety and infrastructure. Thus the bridges and ruts should be fixed and the fire, EMS, police and prisons should be funded first.
We could do with less restrictions on property use and fewer codes. We could also look at the costs of height restrictions, noise ordinances, light ordinances, scenic corridor ordinances and decide which of these, if any we want to fund in place of fixing ruts and putting out fires. We could also look at non-profits raising their own funds and funding things like parks and libraries with user fees. All government, Federal, State and Local must realize that no one can afford to do everything for everybody.

I don't know what the answers are which is why I am asking questions. I think I am hearing from the ones in the know that this year we either raise taxes or cut services somewhere. Since I don't hear anyone advocating higher taxes, let the dueling begin. I do appreciate those gathering information and sharing it with us and I hope they don't mind people like me asking what may be dumb questions.:cool:
 
No, I stated previously I hope layoffs and pay cuts would be the last resort. What I am getting at is moving government back to what it is supposed to do. On the local level, that is provide for public safety and infrastructure. Thus the bridges and ruts should be fixed and the fire, EMS, police and prisons should be funded first.
We could do with less restrictions on property use and fewer codes. We could also look at the costs of height restrictions, noise ordinances, light ordinances, scenic corridor ordinances and decide which of these, if any we want to fund in place of fixing ruts and putting out fires. We could also look at non-profits raising their own funds and funding things like parks and libraries with user fees. All government, Federal, State and Local must realize that no one can afford to do everything for everybody.

I don't know what the answers are which is why I am asking questions. I think I am hearing from the ones in the know that this year we either raise taxes or cut services somewhere. Since I don't hear anyone advocating higher taxes, let the dueling begin. I do appreciate those gathering information and sharing it with us and I hope they don't mind people like me asking what may be dumb questions.:cool:

I don't mind your questions at all - in fact I enjoy measuring the pulse of what the citizens of Walton County find important. I don't always agree, but I listen and reevaluate my thoughts.

One must remember one thing - property values lag one year behind as far as the property appraisers office is concerned. The 18.6% loss in values is a year behind reality of values today. Short sales, foreclosures will really hit next year. In a phone conversation with the property appraiser today we talked about this issue and it appears that the loss will be greater next year.

I mention this only because one must only look to California and see the effects of unchecked government growth. If we do not addresss the issue of growth in the size of government and reduce the wasted dollars we will get there soon.

Also consider that over 7,000 parcels in Walton County did not/could not pay their taxes last year. That number has grown at an alarming rate since 2006.

Priorities will become the key issue !

It will be a real downey brook.
 
Last edited:
Although I will not disagree that improvement could and should be made, but there are services/ offices that are going to be affected, ie, Property Appraisers, Clerk of Court, Tax Collector, Supervisor of Election causing services to be cut which in my opinion are important and necessary offices. I would also have severe issue with the State taking over any of these offices because then you have no local accountability. They already burden our local constitutional officers.
 
Although I will not disagree that improvement could and should be made, but there are services/ offices that are going to be affected, ie, Property Appraisers, Clerk of Court, Tax Collector, Supervisor of Election causing services to be cut which in my opinion are important and necessary offices. I would also have severe issue with the State taking over any of these offices because then you have no local accountability. They already burden our local constitutional officers.

Well - the tax collector (fee based on requested $55,000 for the cost of mailing trim notices), property appraiser (budget approved by DOR) ,SOE budgets were scrubbed very little. Different story concerning the Clerks office. The Tax Collector actually returns excess fees to the County at the end of the year - they are a revenue producer.
 
Last edited:
Not all services provided by the County are revenue producers, which lead me to believe based on comments made by folks here, people want effiency.
 
Well - the tax collector (fee based on requested $55,000 for the cost of mailing trim notices), property appraiser (budget approved by DOR) ,SOE budgets were scrubbed very little. Different story concerning the Clerks office. The Tax Collector actually returns excess fees to the County at the end of the year - they are a revenue producer.


The State seems to have taken over a major portion of the Clerk's budget from what I am reading.
 
Could you explain that? How can the state "take over" the Clerk's budget?:confused:


You really should follow along when the legislature meets. They do some crazy stuff. The clerk is run on court fees for the most part. The state has an ever increasing sum returned to them and they parcel it back out.
 
You really should follow along when the legislature meets. They do some crazy stuff. The clerk is run on court fees for the most part. The state has an ever increasing sum returned to them and they parcel it back out.


Hmmmmm, sounds like another South Florida welfare plan to me.:angry:
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top