scooterbug44
SoWal Expert
5 bullet points won't cover it - luckily there are thousands of posts here on a wide variety of subjects so you can figure it out for yourself. 


5 bullet points won't cover it - luckily there are thousands of posts here on a wide variety of subjects so you can figure it out for yourself.![]()

That's what those thousands of posts are - though some are more rants than thoughts/philosophies.![]()
program.Both dealerships fear the government will not make good on the program's debts.The program, officially called the Car Allowance Rebate System
, or CARS, is designed to help consumers buy or lease a more environmentally friendly vehicle from a participating dealer when they trade in a less fuel-efficient car or truck.Consumers can earn either $3,500 or $4,500 in exchange for their gas guzzlers. The federal program is designed to energize the economy, boost auto sales and put safer, cleaner and more fuel-efficient vehicles on the nation's roadways.The program originally had $1 billion earmarked to fund it. Those funds were gone in a week. House lawmakers have approved another $2 billion to fund the project. The Senate has yet to vote on it.The Jim Ellis Automotive Group began turning customers away Monday night."As of last night, there's a moratorium," Jim Ellis Chevy General Manager Mark Frost told Channel 2's Jim Strickland. "We're not doing any more Cash for Clunkers deals until we get word that the Senate has approved the additional $2 billion."Jim Ellis Chevy in Chamblee has to use remote lots to store more than 200 clunker trade-ins. They've got plenty on the line should the government not pay."About $800,000, and it's making us pretty nervous."Dealers started applying for rebate payments a week and a half ago, but they complain the government's procedure is as clunky as the cars."We don't know what they're waiting for, if we've missed something," Jason Moore at Kia of Conyers reported. "If they're requesting something more. We're just in limbo of what happens next." {snipped}I'll take one issue with this. A majority of that spending is on domestic durable good and employment / benefits payments to american citizens. In fact our recent GDP numbers were boyed signifigantly thanks to military related domestic durable goods purchases.
We can discuss whether this money is better spent on something else - unemployment, free healthcare, birdges and roads, or even not at all (we could reduce the national deficit by pulling all our troops back home.) But generally military spending, especially during a major economic downturn, is certainly not wasted. This bares out in current economic data and in historical data from previous wars - military spending is essentially another form of stimulus. So take your pick, cash for clunkers or a new jet plane, the differences in terms of the effects on the economy don't exist.
![]()
I'm wondering with all this fuel efficiency, when the price of gas is going to double to make up the difference. The government doesn't own the oil companies. :roll:

I'm wondering with all this fuel efficiency, when the price of gas is going to double to make up the difference. The government doesn't own the oil companies. :roll: