• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Deficitville

New posts

Bob

SoWal Insider
washingtonpost.com Analysts Expect Long-Term, Costly U.S. Campaign in Afghanistan







By Walter Pincus
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, August 9, 2009

Since the invasion of Afghanistan eight years ago, the United States has spent $223 billion on war-related funding for that country, according to the Congressional Research Service. Aid expenditures, excluding the cost of combat operations, have grown exponentially, from $982 million in 2003 to $9.3 billion last year.

The costs are almost certain to keep growing. The Obama administration is in the process of overhauling the U.S. approach to Afghanistan, putting its focus on long-term security, economic sustainability and development. That approach is also likely to require deployment of more American military personnel, at the very least to train additional Afghan security forces.

Later this month, Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, is expected to present his analysis of the situation in the country. The analysis could prompt an increase in U.S. troop levels to help implement President Obama's new strategy.
 
teabagging warhawks, fiscal conservatives, vegans, islamofascist bounty hunters, players of the electro-theremin please weigh in.
 
teabagging warhawks, fiscal conservatives, vegans, islamofascist bounty hunters, players of the electro-theremin please weigh in.

Hmm - who would have thought that it would be so much cheaper to fight murdering thugs half way around the globe for most of the decade than to fund congressional pet causes (read buy democratic votes) under the guise of a stimulus package? Apparently, we should fight more and pander less in order to bring down the deficit.
 
Hmm - who would have thought that it would be so much cheaper to fight murdering thugs half way around the globe for most of the decade than to fund congressional pet causes (read buy democratic votes) under the guise of a stimulus package? Apparently, we should fight more and pander less in order to bring down the deficit.
muderous thugs, is that like union thugs or gooks, nips, krauts?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top