• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

bye bye missle shield

New posts
Good point. I actually like that argument.

However, why didn't the libs understand this argument in 2003-2006?? I believe I heard it a lot back when Bush was being criticized for going to Iraq based on the best available intelligence at the time.:confused:
best available intelligence at the time
 
Is it possible the POTUS changed his mind based on the latest and greatest data and recommendations from his advisors???

(As opposed to anyone lying or being racist)

:idontno:
.
As I remember, this is what he said he would do when he was campaigning - analyze the progression of situation and be willing to adjust as needed.

.
 
Last edited:
For me the difference between the two is this-

When a potus makes the decision to invade another country we are immediately putting troops into harms way, immediately moving forward with killing civilians, immediately committing ourselves to 10 years or more occupation, immediately spending big time $$$ to cover it.

When a potus goes back and forth on plans for a missile system he/she is just altering planning and strategy.
Funny. Afganistan comes to mind.
 
Funny. Afganistan comes to mind.

Hi Andy, thx for responding to my post. Would you please expand on this. I don't know what it means. Pls dummy it down for me and provide me context/how it relates to and/or contradicts my words.

G
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top