• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

US pays $400 per gallon for gas in Afghanistan

New posts

mtlinscomb

Beach Fanatic
US pays $400 per gallon for gas in Afghanistan | Raw Story

Last year, the price of gasoline in the United States topped the $4 per gallon mark.
This year in Afghanistan, the price has topped $400.
The stunning revelation emerged Thursday in a report from the Pentagon to House officials. The information conveyed offers new insight into a recent report by the Congressional Research Service, which found that the US spends $1 million per year for each servicemember on the ground in Afghanistan.
Why so much? The cost includes shipping, which sometimes includes the pricetag of a helicopter flight. Sending fuel by helicopter is woefully inefficient, because it uses up almost as much fuel as it carries.
Speaking to the Capitol Hill newspaper The Hill, House Appropriations chairman John Murtha (D-PA) said the figure was ?worrisome? and "we started looking into it.?​
​
Afghanistan is also landlocked, meaning that fuel must be transported in ways that stretch the limits of economic reason.
Because the country has no seaports, fuel is shipped to Karachi, in Pakistan, then carried across land by commercial trucks through Afghanistan. For remote bases, gasoline is sometimes transported by air.
"One of the most expensive ways to supply fuel is by transporting it in bladders carried by helicopter; the amount that can be flown at one time can barely satisfy the need for fuel," the Hill notes.
The paper notes that the $400 pricetag is referred to in Pentagon argot as the ?fully burdened cost of fuel.?
The government's Defense Energy Support Center provides fuel to the military at $2.78 per gallon, the conveyance of which then grows exponentially more expensive as it travels through dangerous combat zones.
Gen. James Conway, who runs the Marine Corps, told a Navy forum that perilous risky routes up gasoline that originally cost $1.04 gallon up to $400.
?These are fairly major problems for us,? Conway was quoted as saying.



:eek:
 
Well, that would certainly explain why the wars cost so much!

I find this rather hard to believe - obviously the difficulties of the location and terrain would bump the price up, but $400 a gallon seems excessive.
 
The simple solution is to invade a neighboring country with a lot of oil. Oh wait a minute, we already did that. :lol: Where's our free oil!
 
The simple solution is to invade a neighboring country with a lot of oil. Oh wait a minute, we already did that. :lol: Where's our free oil!

Yeah, you must be talking about the oil that was going to pay for the Iraq War. Hmmm...somebody must have miscalculated...:floor:
 
The simple solution is to invade a neighboring country with a lot of oil. Oh wait a minute, we already did that. :lol: Where's our free oil!


We could have all of the oil in the middle east but still cant burn it to run vehicles....

p.s.....It's still no excuse for $400 a gallon...:yikes:
 
I find this absolutely ridiculous - how is it noone can think of any lower cost alternatives?

Alternate energy? Bio-diesel? Dropping fuel tanks out of airplanes? Using humans or animals to carry fuel?

Yes, there aren't a lot of airports or infrastructure in Afghanistan - but exactly where do we fight wars where there are?

The Afghans and Taliban sure as hell aren't spending $400 a gallon on fuel. Of course, they also aren't giving private contractors carte blanche at the taxpayer's expense......................which tends to raise prices quite a bit. :angry:
 
DUMB and SUBSTANCE FREE!

Dumb and substance free... Krazy K, that could be your new tag line!

Seriously, where does the $400 go? To Halliburton, who probably outsources the tanker truck drivers from Pakistan for $8 an hour...
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top