• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Fox News isn't a news organization..

New posts
Huh??? :floor:

President Obama doesn't need any Republicans to play ball with him. He has majorities in the House and the Senate.

Government works better when at least one of the three - President, House, or Senate is of a different party. That's the best way to assure that most of the population is represented in decision making, not just half.

Winnie, Let me interpret here for you--what the eloquent LuciferSam is trying to say is that he doesn't need any of the" No" Republican Party, the "Block-all-legislation" Republican Party, the Republicans that are currently on display in front of the American public nightly--John Baynor, Michelle Bachman, Eric Cantor, Joe Wilson. He only want to play ball with the "reasonable," normal Rebublicans, like Olympia Snow. I mean really can you blame him?? :idontno:

Besides, only 1 in 5 American as of today identifies themselves as Republuican--there really is "NO" party going on....
 
Huh??? :floor:

President Obama doesn't need any Republicans to play ball with him. He has majorities in the House and the Senate.

Government works better when at least one of the three - President, House, or Senate is of a different party. That's the best way to assure that most of the population is represented in decision making, not just half.

That's exactly what I'm getting at. He has the power to give the Republicans a well-deserved stompin' but he hasn't exercised it.
 
Winnie, Let me interpret here for you--what the eloquent LuciferSam is trying to say is that he doesn't need any of the" No" Republican Party, the "Block-all-legislation" Republican Party, the Republicans that are currently on display in front of the American public nightly--John Baynor, Michelle Bachman, Eric Cantor, Joe Wilson. He only want to play ball with the "reasonable," normal Rebublicans, like Olympia Snow. I mean really can you blame him?? :idontno:

Besides, only 1 in 5 American as of today identifies themselves as Republuican--there really is "NO" party going on....

That's exactly what I'm getting at. He has the power to give the Republicans a well-deserved stompin' but he hasn't exercised it.

So, 20% self identify as Republican and 30% self identify as Democrat. I looked up your source for you - http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/4_090428_NBC-WSJ_Full.pdf

This means that the President should not be " stompin' " anybody.
We all are entitled to representation of our views in Washington. We the people.
 
So, 20% self identify as Republican and 30% self identify as Democrat. I looked up your source for you - http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/MSNBC/Sections/NEWS/4_090428_NBC-WSJ_Full.pdf

This means that the President should not be " stompin' " anybody.
We all are entitled to representation of our views in Washington. We the people.

My POINT exactly when I called the White House yesterday--just push the healthcare reform through NOW-forget trying to get on the good side of ONE Republican senator, Olympia Snow--there are 177 lives a day being lost because of people going without hrealthcare! Who cares about Olympia Snow (except maybe Mr. Snow)!!

Obama needs to get much nastier to succeed. This bi-partisanship is really dumb-Republicans want no part of it anyway.
 
Last edited:
White House Loses Bid to Exclude Fox News From Pay Czar Interview - Political News - FOXNews.com

The Obama administration on Thursday failed in its attempt to manipulate other news networks into isolating and excluding Fox News, as Republicans on Capitol Hill stepped up their criticism of the hardball tactics employed by the White House.
The Obama administration on Thursday tried to make "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg available for interviews to every member of the White House pool except Fox News. The pool is the five-network rotation that for decades has shared the costs and duties of daily coverage of the presidency.
But the Washington bureau chiefs of the five TV networks consulted and decided that none of their reporters would interview Feinberg unless Fox News was included.
The administration relented, making Feinberg available for all five pool members and Bloomberg TV.
The pushback came after White House senior adviser David Axelrod told ABC News' "This Week" on Sunday that Fox News is not a real news organization and other news networks "ought not to treat them that way."
The decision to boycott the Feinberg interview unless Fox News was included was cheered by media analysts, who said the administration's gambit was taking its feud with Fox News too far. President Obama has already declined to go on "Fox News Sunday," even while appearing on the other Sunday shows.
"I'm really cheered by the other members saying "No, if Fox can't be part of it, we won't be part of it,'" said Baltimore Sun TV critic David Zurawik, calling the move to limit Feinberg's availability "outrageous."
"What it's really about to me is the Executive Branch of the government trying to tell the press how it should behave. I mean, this democracy -- we know this -- only works with a free and unfettered press to provide information," he said.
Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. said the administration was potentially in violation of the Constitution with its attempt to restrict access to the "eyes and ears" of the country.
"What was averted was a very serious Constitutional violation by the White House," he said. "There cannot be selective and arbitrary access to the White House based on some subjective determination."
Several top White House advisers have appeared on other news channels to criticize Fox News' coverage of the administration, dismiss the network as the mouthpiece of the Republican Party and urge other news organizations not to treat Fox News as a legitimate news network.
On Wednesday, Obama, speaking publicly for the first time about his administration's portrayal of Fox News as illegitimate, said he's not "losing sleep" over the controversy.
"I think that what our advisers simply said is, is that we are going to take media as it comes," Obama said when asked about his advisers targeting the network openly. "And if media is operating, basically, as a talk radio format, then that's one thing. And if it's operating as a news outlet, then that's another. But it's not something I'm losing a lot of sleep over."
Obama's comments also came after he met Monday with political commentators Keith Olbermann, Rachel Maddow, Eugene Robinson, E.J. Dionne, Ron Brownstein, John Dickerson, Frank Rich, Jerry Seib, Maureen Dowd, Bob Herbert, Gloria Borger, and Gwen Ifill.
House Republican leaders rushed to the defense of conservative commentators Thursday after the comments.
Rep. Mike Pence, chairman of the House Republican Conference, said conservative commentators speak more for Americans than the national media outlets that have targeted them for criticism.
"Goaded on by a White House increasingly intolerant of criticism, lately the national media has taken aim at conservative commentators in radio and television," the Indiana Republican said on the House floor. "Suggesting that they only speak for a small group of activists and even suggesting in one report today that Republicans in Washington are 'worried about their electoral effect.' Well, that's hogwash."

===============================================================

other newtorks realize obama hasn't yet secured the opportunity to be president for life and that this slope is a slippery one
 
Last edited:
My POINT exactly when I called the White House yesterday--just push the healthcare reform through NOW-forget trying to get on the good side of ONE Republican senator, Olympia Snow--there are 177 lives a day being lost because of people going without hrealthcare! Who cares about Olympia Snow (except maybe Mr. Snow)!!

Obama needs to get much nastier to succeed. This bi-partisanship is really dumb-Republicans want no part of it anyway.

Reid and Pelosi have much bigger problems than one republican senator. The democratic party went out of it's way to promote moderate democrats and independents for candidates over the last two election cycles - these folks are now balking at issues such as cost and government run initiatives. Without their support the democrats really can't get much done, so they have no choice but to listen to them. (Which is probably a good thing, no?)
 
I have a new respect for the other networks who stood up and protected freedom of press and speech. They should win an award or a prize.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top