Lynnie
SoWal Insider
Receiving the sacrament? Technically it's the receiver who should be excluding themselves in this case. I find it odd the criticism is on the Church, it should be on Kennedy. He shows just how little respect he has for the church and scripture he supposedly follows.
I speak from personal experience - I am not a good catholic, I do not go to confession, and I do not attend church regularly. However I do occasionally attend. I haven't received in well over 20 years, there's a moral boundary there I simply can't cross. Kennedy, who I'd imagine is no better a christian than myself (or likely worse considering the family he comes from), is whining because the church chastised him for making the opposite decision? Good for them, shame on Kennedy for being a pompous ass.
I agree with you from the respect of following your respective religious doctrines. Is it possible that he is a Kennedy and is leveraging their name?
When I first became Episopalian, we could only receive communion if had been baptized and even that has been removed from our doctrines so that now anyone can receive the sacraments.
As I said earlier, the Congregants are the backbone of the Catholic Church and you have taken the Catechism and teachings very seriously! I would say that you are a good Catholic because you do follow the teachings.
I just don't like exclusions and when I go to a Catholic Church, I am respectful and do not take Communion, but do receive a blessing from the Celebrating Priest. Also, I don't believe in the Transubstantiation and therefore my taking of communion in a Catholic Church would go against my beliefs as well as be disrespectful to many people like yourself.
I replied that if she did, the plaster would crack! She is a member of the Episcopal Church in US and Anglican in England.