I think a lot of them are weak. Followers, not leaders and got bought.
I was refering to the entire bill, not just the abortion component. Because babies "cost" I guess the government will next prohibit us from having them.![]()
One thing that continues to suprise me about this whole debate is the number of people who seem to think insurance companies are not supposed to make a profit or should provide unlimited care at a minimum premium. I would suggest a class in economics or business administration will cure such notions.
What scares me about this bill is that these same people will be administering the program. Without an idea of profit/loss the deficit will grow exponentially.
Decent business practice is one thing--greed and dishonesty coupled with incompetence is something completely different. This kind of behavior is what I used to expect in third world countries where there was no civil government--
I have no problem with companies making a profit, but the insurance industry makes a profit at the expense of people's lives and that is not right.
There is absolutely no reason that anyone-- bankers or insurance and drug company executives, should take home millions of dollars in bonuses and profits when they have made it either from denying coverage to customers who have gotten sick; children with preexisting conditions; and workers who lose their jobs; or cancer patients who must pay $3600 for one dose of medicine.
There is no reason a banker should get a bonus when his company is bailed out by the taxpayers money.
Decent business practice is one thing--greed and dishonesty coupled with incompetence is something completely different. This kind of behavior is what I used to expect in third world countries where there was no civil government--
Maybe we should reform the tax code to a flat tax so that these companies and executives will finally pay taxes like the rest of us.
We should have never bailed any of them out to start with. Let failures fail.
As far as profits all companies make a profit at the expense of others.
Most of the support for this bill has been bought and paid for. Otherwise, why can't a party with huge majorities in both houses pass it on the first reading?

I'm confused. Which party are you talking about and which bill?
That doesn't happen with the holy repubs?![]()