• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

A House of Cards Will Fall Down

New posts

beachFool

Beach Fanatic
Economics 101 and The Songwriters Festival

www.waltonsun.com

1/22/2011

We closed the 2011 30A Songwriters Festival with The Shadowboxers at Pandoras. Chronic Jester was just a little too late for us. Friday night Mike Whitty played Shorty?s Upstairs. Later, he swapped guitars and got on stage with Pale Blue Dot at Pandora?s, but that?s another story. He was number three on the totem pole and had to follow Katie Rogers and Roy Schneider. It amazes me how performing songwriters can follow an act that blew the audience away. Composers of the written word catch a break. John Steinbeck never had to go on stage after Dr. Hunter Thompson.

Just a few hours earlier my fingers were hovering over the keyboard trying to get something down since deadline was looming. I got lucky ? Shorty?s oozed creativity and a little bit stuck on me.
Mike?s right. We are living in a house of cards ... a credit card. We put both the Bush and Obama tax cuts on a credit card. Old folks vote, so Medicare Part D goes on the credit card. Remember Axis of Evil? So we invade Iraq, again on a credit card. Just kick the can down the road, let someone else pay for it.

The drumbeat in Washington involves reducing the nation?s deficit ? generally by eliminating waste and abuse. We need leadership not talking points. Our country must have a sustainable budget, but ?waste and abuse? is nothing more than a red herring. Reducing spending will solve the deficit but your pet programs ? whatever they may be ? will have to be drastically cut. If we want to grow the economy we should fund, not cut, education and infrastructure.

Long-time tax cut advocate Alan Greenspan finally admits the harsh truth. In numerous interviews, but most recently in the staunchly conservative Wall Street Journal, Greenspan warns the risk of a bond market crisis is so great he reverses himself and favors raising taxes immediately. (Wall Street Journal, Jan. 8, 2011). Raising taxes appeases no one, including yours truly, but President Reagan raised taxes. Yes, he did and he did it often. Reagan raised business taxes in 1982, payroll taxes in 1983 and increased energy taxes in 1984 (Forbes, Feb. 3, 2010).

Reuters found that more than 70 percent of Americans do not favor raising the nation?s debt limit. In a complete denial of arithmetic most of the same Americans did not want to reduce spending either. Cutting the budgets of financial regulation does gain modest support (53 percent). Remember financial chicanery aided and abetted the 2008 fiscal crisis. Reducing oversight will be little more than penny-wise and pound-foolish. The 700-pound gorilla is Medicare spending and hardly anyone (23 percent) wants to reduce the popular program?s costs. Failure to raise the debt ceiling, as unpopular as it may be, could shock the economy much like Lehman Brothers? collapse in 2008.

Thanks again for the help, Mike. My friends, Dread Clampitt, speak the truth, ?We are in this together?. Thanks to the Cultural Arts Association, the organizers and especially the volunteers. The Songwriters Festival is the best thing on 30A.

Buz Livingston is a certified financial planner. He operates Livingston Financial Planning Inc. focusing on hourly financial planning and investment management. Contact him directly at 850-267-1068 or at buz@LivingstonFinancial.net.
 
i don't want 70 percent of the uninformed swaying policy. Most don't know their representatives, much less basic econ.
 
You can stop needling Republicans about what programs they want to cut now. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio)'s Republican Study Committee is introducing the Spending Reduction Act of 2011, to cut back "non-security discretionary spending" to 2008 levels and to slice that spending back to 2006 levels from 2012 onward. That, they point out, would keep it "the same level as in effect during the last year of GOP control of the Congress."

The proposal does what Republicans have been talking about for two years -- "repeal" of remaining stimulus funds (now $45 billion), privatizing Fannie and Freddie ($30 billion), repealing Medicaid' FMAP increase ($16.1 billion), and what they estimate at $330 billion in discretionary spending cuts. Highlights of these projected annual savings:

Weigel : House Conservatives Introduce Spending Cuts: $2.5 Trillion Over Ten Years

WASHINGTON - Back home, tea party members clamoring for the debt-ridden federal government toslash spending say nothing should be off-limits. Tea party-backed lawmakers echo that argument, andthey're not exempting the military's multibillion-dollar budget in a time of war.

That demand is creating hard choices for the newest members of Congress, especially Republicanswho owe their elections and solid House majority to the influential grass-roots movement. Cuttingdefense and canceling weapons could mean deep spending reductions and high marks from tea partymembers as the nation wrestles with a $1.3 trillion deficit. Yet it also could jeopardize thousandsof jobs at a time when unemployment is running high.

Tea party pushes defense cuts | Columbus Dispatch Politics

Times they are a ch ch ch changin'.
 
i don't want 70 percent of the uninformed swaying policy. Most don't know their representatives, much less basic econ.

My. How Elitist.

Just get elected! Then you're free to merrily disregard the majority of your constituency w/ impunity AND perks!
Then again... banking is a nice quiet field with lots of creative freedom (and all the icky-messy stuff can be outsourced to Manila).
 
One doesn't need an econ degree to have some common sense when it comes to spending. When the pocket is empty, the party is over.

Greenspan isn't being an alarmist when he talks about a bond crisis. This bit of news just skimmed past our noses, but it is extremely important to our economy. This is one of the reasons I was so negative about the markets this year and the FEDS involvement.

China Expands Easing of Capital Controls on Exporters - WSJ.com

which means all that extra money China had to buy Treasuries with will be curtailed, perhaps they may even start selling them; not to mention who knows where exporters will sit their cash; certainly not in a depreciating dollar vs an appreciating yuan.
 
Economics 101 and The Songwriters Festival

www.waltonsun.com

1/22/2011

We closed the 2011 30A Songwriters Festival with The Shadowboxers at Pandoras. Chronic Jester was just a little too late for us. Friday night Mike Whitty played Shorty?s Upstairs. Later, he swapped guitars and got on stage with Pale Blue Dot at Pandora?s, but that?s another story. He was number three on the totem pole and had to follow Katie Rogers and Roy Schneider. It amazes me how performing songwriters can follow an act that blew the audience away. Composers of the written word catch a break. John Steinbeck never had to go on stage after Dr. Hunter Thompson.

Just a few hours earlier my fingers were hovering over the keyboard trying to get something down since deadline was looming. I got lucky ? Shorty?s oozed creativity and a little bit stuck on me.
Mike?s right. We are living in a house of cards ... a credit card. We put both the Bush and Obama tax cuts on a credit card. Old folks vote, so Medicare Part D goes on the credit card. Remember Axis of Evil? So we invade Iraq, again on a credit card. Just kick the can down the road, let someone else pay for it.

The drumbeat in Washington involves reducing the nation?s deficit ? generally by eliminating waste and abuse. We need leadership not talking points. Our country must have a sustainable budget, but ?waste and abuse? is nothing more than a red herring. Reducing spending will solve the deficit but your pet programs ? whatever they may be ? will have to be drastically cut. If we want to grow the economy we should fund, not cut, education and infrastructure.

Long-time tax cut advocate Alan Greenspan finally admits the harsh truth. In numerous interviews, but most recently in the staunchly conservative Wall Street Journal, Greenspan warns the risk of a bond market crisis is so great he reverses himself and favors raising taxes immediately. (Wall Street Journal, Jan. 8, 2011). Raising taxes appeases no one, including yours truly, but President Reagan raised taxes. Yes, he did and he did it often. Reagan raised business taxes in 1982, payroll taxes in 1983 and increased energy taxes in 1984 (Forbes, Feb. 3, 2010).

Reuters found that more than 70 percent of Americans do not favor raising the nation?s debt limit. In a complete denial of arithmetic most of the same Americans did not want to reduce spending either. Cutting the budgets of financial regulation does gain modest support (53 percent). Remember financial chicanery aided and abetted the 2008 fiscal crisis. Reducing oversight will be little more than penny-wise and pound-foolish. The 700-pound gorilla is Medicare spending and hardly anyone (23 percent) wants to reduce the popular program?s costs. Failure to raise the debt ceiling, as unpopular as it may be, could shock the economy much like Lehman Brothers? collapse in 2008.

Thanks again for the help, Mike. My friends, Dread Clampitt, speak the truth, ?We are in this together?. Thanks to the Cultural Arts Association, the organizers and especially the volunteers. The Songwriters Festival is the best thing on 30A.

Buz Livingston is a certified financial planner. He operates Livingston Financial Planning Inc. focusing on hourly financial planning and investment management. Contact him directly at 850-267-1068 or at buz@LivingstonFinancial.net.

Following the suits against JP Morgan/Bear Stearns and the criminal fraud charges brought in regards to what their own traders labeled "sack of sh*#" securities they were selling, not to mention the already settled charges for same behavior by Goldman Squid and BOA/Countrywide and Fannie's Franklin Raines charged and settling for $24 million he had laying around and the fact that Greenspan being wrong about that axis being able to self regulate, I would do exactly opposite of what alan suggest and would start by taxing Hedge fund managers income at a rate we all pay and not capital gains rate. Then if you clawed back the billions paid to execs at that axis, disolved naked default swaps, modified the remaining 6 million or so of defaulting mortgages you might have some people saying now we are a little more "all in this together".
 
Last edited:
My. How Elitist.

Just get elected! Then you're free to merrily disregard the majority of your constituency w/ impunity AND perks!
Then again... banking is a nice quiet field with lots of creative freedom (and all the icky-messy stuff can be outsourced to Manila).
i believe you should pass a basic civics course to be able to vote. I think a similar test could go to all wishing to marry and breed. gun ownership should require a safety course. We need to set a bar for people that requires more than a beating heart to participate in activities that may ultimately cost society a great deal. elitist? you've got to be kidding
 
One doesn't need an econ degree to have some common sense when it comes to spending. When the pocket is empty, the party is over.

Greenspan isn't being an alarmist when he talks about a bond crisis. This bit of news just skimmed past our noses, but it is extremely important to our economy. This is one of the reasons I was so negative about the markets this year and the FEDS involvement.

China Expands Easing of Capital Controls on Exporters - WSJ.com

which means all that extra money China had to buy Treasuries with will be curtailed, perhaps they may even start selling them; not to mention who knows where exporters will sit their cash; certainly not in a depreciating dollar vs an appreciating yuan.
correct me if I'm wrong, but this is the same Greenspan that said the Feds should not bother to regulate because Wall Street will always figure away around the rules.
 
i believe you should pass a basic civics course to be able to vote. I think a similar test could go to all wishing to marry and breed. gun ownership should require a safety course. We need to set a bar for people that requires more than a beating heart to participate in activities that may ultimately cost society a great deal. elitist? you've got to be kidding

:lol::lol::lol: Yep... just teasin' ya Bro'!
Geesh... took ya long enough to bite! :wave:
 
The test for voting should be implemented just after the test for parenthood. ;-)
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top