GoodWitch58
Beach Fanatic
It's on my buy list for my next books a million visit.
I have read the first few chapters and it's interesting...a different approach to the subject. His interview about it with Charlie Rose was informative.
It's on my buy list for my next books a million visit.
Do you really believe GE paid zero tax?
I only know what has been reported, I haven't reviewed their tax returns. But I certainly think it is within the realm of possibility that GE paid no income tax last year.
How much did ge pay in Medicare and social security taxes on behalf of it's employees? How much in property taxes and sales tax did it pay to the communities where it's plants are located? Would we really be better off further raising the price to do business in america?
Just another right wing fabrication and distortion of the facts I am sure![]()
Did GE get a $3.2 billion tax refund? No.
Did GE pay U.S. income taxes in 2010? Yes, it paid estimated taxes for 2010, and also made payments for previous years. Think of it as your having paid withholding taxes on your salary in 2010, and sending the IRS a check on April 15, 2010, covering your balance owed for 2009.
GE's 2010 financial statements reported a $3.25 billion U.S. "current tax benefit," which is where the Times, which declined comment, got its $3.2 billion "tax benefit" number. But a company's "current tax" number has nothing to do with what it actually pays in taxes for a given year. "Current tax benefit" and "current tax expense" are so-called financial reporting numbers, used to calculate the profits a company reports to shareholders.
They have nothing to do with what a company sends to (or receives from) the IRS. "Any correlation between the 'current tax expense' and the current tax payable is likely coincidental," says a leading tax authority, Ed Outslay, Deloitte/Michael Licata professor of accounting at Michigan State University's business school.
The truth about GE's tax bill - FORTUNE Features - Fortune on CNNMoney.com
The truth about GE's tax bill
Read the entire article, It's ok to seek additional information from more than one source.

You mean the New York Times got the facts of a story wrong? That bastion of fair and balanced reporting made an error? Say it ain't so.![]()