crist scott debate

[Douglas]

No, I quoted Pew and PunditFact. The link was where I read the results of the survey that Pew Research conducted. It wasn't PunditFact's study. It's clearly separated in the article. Click the damn link.

You only quoted PunditFact, but, okay, the first two sentences were a reference by PunditFact to a Pew survey. All the rest was *not* from Pew. "PunditFact is tracking the accuracy of claims made on the five major networks using our network scorecards." It's a clever trick--mention a respected source in your biased liberal blog to lend credence to your propaganda.

 

[poppy]

You only quoted PunditFact, but, okay, the first two sentences were a reference by PunditFact to a Pew survey. All the rest was *not* from Pew. "PunditFact is tracking the accuracy of claims made on the five major networks using our network scorecards." It's a clever trick--mention a respected source in your biased liberal blog to lend credence to your propaganda.

Holy crap! Turn your Fox News back on and become even more ignorant.

 

[m1a1mg]

No, I quoted Pew and PunditFact. The link was where I read the results of the survey that Pew Research conducted. It wasn't PunditFact's study. It's clearly separated in the article. Click the damn link.

To pick at nits, it isn't really clearly separated. It talks about Pew, which I trust, than switches to PunditFact, which I don't trust, almost seamlessly.

EDIT: To add: Just to cut you off, no, I don't watch Fox.

 

[Matt J]

To pick at nits, it isn't really clearly separated. It talks about Pew, which I trust, than switches to PunditFact, which I don't trust, almost seamlessly.

EDIT: To add: Just to cut you off, no, I don't watch Fox.

You can be completely misinformed without watching Fox.

 

[Andy A]

You can be completely misinformed without watching Fox.

Yeah, that's obvious. All you have to do is read many of the posts here delivered by our ultra liberals.

 

[poppy]

From the serial e-mailer who has never fact checked himself. For Andy it's true if he believes it's true, proof be damned.

 

[Bob]

Is that survey related to actual news programming or to the talking heads like O'Riley, Hannity, Limbaugh, Sharptonm Mathews, etc...? Because there is a big difference.

I'm not picking one new site over another. I read them all voraciously and use that thing in my head called a brain to pick out the obvious BS...which does come from every site.

That survey does raise an interesting question. If CNN is supposedly trusted over FOX, why does FOX rank as the top news cable network (3rd behind ESPN and TBS) while CNN and MSNBC place 29th and 31 respectively? There seems to be a disconnect somewhere...

It's all the same garbage...corporate sponsored ****e. Fox uses Tand A, flags,fear to great advantage. They market a perception of everything's a permanent crisis. beautiful women telling you the end is near is compelling. the news is like eating a fast food burger...cheap,filling,bad for you....you are consuming bile so someone can sell soap. CNN MsNBC are the same...contrived, slanted crap..minions for the psuedo 2 party system that gives you no choice in the matter but to support a government abusing it's own populace to support it's excesses.

 

[m1a1mg]

 

[Andy A]

From the serial e-mailer who has never fact checked himself. For Andy it's true if he believes it's true, proof be damned.

You know, I've said I wouldn't reply to your posts only because they are so ill informed and stupid but I am going to break that promise for one time only.

I am damn well tired of your personal attacks which have absolutely no foundation. You talk about emails and have no idea of the actual premise behind them because all you can do is cite libreral blogs and reports as facts. I'll gladly put my experience, backround and education up against yours and we'll see whose more capable of being believed. Yes, I do think that life experiences bear more weight than some off the wall article by a biased writer be he be conservative or liberal. You wouldn't understand that as your head is so far up Obama's you know where you can't see clearly. Now back to something far more important than you...football.

 

[poppy]

You know, I've said I wouldn't reply to your posts only because they are so ill informed and stupid but I am going to break that promise for one time only. I am damn well tired of your personal attacks which have absolutely no foundation. You talk about emails and have no idea of the actual premise behind them because all you can do is cite libreral blogs and reports as facts. I'll gladly put my experience, backround and education up against yours and we'll see whose more capable of being believed. Yes, I do think that life experiences bear more weight than some off the wall article by a biased writer be he be conservative or liberal. You wouldn't understand that as your head is so far up Obama's you know where you can't see clearly. Now back to something far more important than you...football.

And I'm tired of your constant whining and superiority complex. Take your life experience and shove it. Life experience is not a substitute for facts.

You want to talk about stupid? Your the one who posted on more than one occasion a chain e-mail that was easily proved to be false yet you still defended it. How's that for a foundation? Your defense one time was that it came from a Lt. Colonel friend of yours as if that made it factual. When called on it you went into your same old life experience rant and not once did you ever say sorry and admit you were wrong. At least I will admit when I'm wrong. You come off sounding like a stubborn fool.

I may disagree with you, but unlike you, I never claim you're wrong when you express your opinion. If you ever think I'm wrong then you prove it. In fact, I encourage it.

As my amorous yet sexually repressed father once said, "a man is a fool if he forwards chain e-mails".

Now go report me.