I call bs on that one. If you sit on your rear end behind a desk 70 might be an ok retirement age but for some this is a nightmare. Those in fields like construction who perform hard physical labor will have a difficult time making it to 70 without serious health risks. Think of a 70 yr. old man in the hot sun installing a new roof on your home. Once again the repubs are removed from the real world just like the jobs bill they refuse to pass because they feel everyone will take the jobs they claim don't exist because of this administration.
You can't call bs unless you propose an alternate solution to the problem. As it stands no one will get benefits by the time I get retirement age because the system will be broke. That is reality.
Is this a new rule? I didn't run for office because I don't claim to have the answers and in this country anyone can question dumb proposals by our elected officials (or proposals by our dumb elected officials). First it was 67 now 70 do you think it will stop there? Twenty years from now it maybe up to 80. Raising the retirement age untill most of those who will be eligible are dead is not an intelligent solution, it's a lazy one.
Social Security is only supposed to be 25% of your retirement income.
As this solution follows the original intent of the founding father of Social Security ( FDR) I guess in this instance lazy is better.![]()
I just did a little back of the envelope math, using my own income and the projection SS does for me, and my parent's SS income, knowing what their last working income was, and to save enough money to provide three times SS for 20 years means we would have had to have saved between 10-15 times our annual GROSS income for retirement.
That can't be right....