• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Brannon guilty on ethics charges

New posts

NotDeadYet

Beach Fanatic
Scott Brannon pleads guilty to multiple ethics violations



August 5, 2008 - 4:20PM
TALLAHASSEE -- Republican Walton County Commissioner Scott Brannon plead guilty to multiple Florida State Constitution ethics violations and agreed to a fine in a plea arrangement with the Florida Ethics Commission. The 17 Count Complaint filed in September 2007 by a Walton County citizen highlighted discrepancies concerning his Full and Public Financial Disclosures in 2003, 2005, and 2006. The Commission found probable cause and began an investigation.
After a preliminary investigation the Ethics Commission Investigators agreed with the Complainant allegations on virtually every violation listed in the complaint. The Commissions Report is now available to the public made possible by the recent guilty plea arrangement.
In his investigative report Ethics Commission Investigator K. Travis Wade said, (Brannon) 'acknowledged that he mistakenly failed to report a Certificate of Deposit as an asset on his form. Although calls to the Respondent to determine the value of the CD (Certificate of Deposit) in 2005 were not returned, he valued the CD at $96,571.00 on his 3003 Commission on Ethics Form 6X (amending the 2003 CE Form 1) and as $515,000.00 on his 2006 CE Form 6X (amending his 2006 CE Form 1).'
Wade also said in his report; 'The Respondent (Brannon) advised by telephone that although he reported his ownership in Four Mile Land Company, as an asset, he forgot to report his 50% ownership in Four Mile Land or his 50% ownership in FR Industries as an asset.' All Companies are located in Freeport, FL. The investigators report contains 40 other notes corresponding to the investigation.
The guilty plea arrangement, signed by Commissioner Brannon, must be approved by the full Ethics Commission in a public meeting on Sept. 5, 2008 at the Florida Senate Building in Tallahassee. The Commission must adjudicate the case or continue the investigation.
Brannon retains the right to withdraw the guilty plea should the investigation into his finances continue.

http://www.waltonsun.com/news/ethics_1952___article.html/guilty_multiple.html
 
So what? How many of us have forgotten to file some arcane piece of triviality? Many I would guess.

Did you read the article? :roll:

Hopefully someone will get hold of the report and post it here.

Then tell me again how this guy ran unopposed. Unless maybe it would be bad business to run against him.

The 17 Count Complaint filed in September 2007 by a Walton County citizen highlighted discrepancies concerning his Full and Public Financial Disclosures in 2003, 2005, and 2006.
 
"Arcane piece of triviality?" He has a legal and moral responsibility to be honest and forthright! Your dismissal of this responsibility is astounding. Sounds like Branno fell short of the mark according to the post.
 
"Arcane piece of triviality?" He has a legal and moral responsibility to be honest and forthright! Your dismissal of this responsibility is astounding. Sounds like Branno fell short of the mark according to the post.


I don't see the big deal is all I am saying.:idontno: I am not a huge fan of public officials having to disclose every single aspect of their lives because I believe many individuals who could really help the public refuse to run because they do not wish for every adversary to be able to pick through their life.:cry: Mr. Brannon has been a good commissioner, give him a rest.:bang:
 
I don't see the big deal is all I am saying.:idontno: I am not a huge fan of public officials having to disclose every single aspect of their lives because I believe many individuals who could really help the public refuse to run because they do not wish for every adversary to be able to pick through their life.:cry: Mr. Brannon has been a good commissioner, give him a rest.:bang:

The problem is that many people who have the ability (which boils down to time flexibility) to run for public office have some accumulated assets that allow them to do so. Those assets absolutely must be disclosed. If everyone had everything they owned in a money market fund and index 500 funds, had no liabilities, etc., then it would not be an issue. But that is hardly ever the case.

There is an old saying: "The appearance of a conflict of interest is just as bad as an actual conflict of interest." Business and/or investment ties can create a conflict of interest when it comes to issues that appear before the county commissioners, the state Legislature, U.S. Congress, etc. (Read: Ro Cutchens, seawalls, 2006.) The public has a right to learn as much as it can so it can be assured that the elected official is acting fairly.

There can and should be no exceptions, no matter how good a job a public official is doing.
 
Big money

Did you read the article? :roll:

Hopefully someone will get hold of the report and post it here.

Then tell me again how this guy ran unopposed. Unless maybe it would be bad business to run against him.

Money, Money, Money! The average person doesn't have the kind of money that it would take to run against him based on his first election. The people with money really wanted him in office and they spent if on him.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top