I heard on the radio this morning, that the Sheriff is going to have to lay off 8 full-time employees and 2 part-time employees, because he wasn't given any extra money.
I'm so glad the voters decided to lay him off this year. He's been nothing but an embarrassment to this county.
.
I thought the tax accountant who spoke for Sheriff Johnson at the latest WalCo Budget Mtg, said it was 8 part-time employees and 2 full-time employees, but I may be mistaken. I still cannot believe that Sheriff Johnson won't speak for himself. I don't think the other County Officers hire CPAs to create budgets, and this particular CPA didn't come on board the Sheriff's train until during the recent $300,000 oops that Sheriff Johnson had.
Who is to blame? Good question. BCC Chairman Larry Jones states that the Commissioners gave the Sheriff a year's notice that ALL County Departments would be working with a zero-increase budget for 2009. The only way Sheriff Johnson can keep a zero-increase budget is by cutting 8 part-time and 2 full-time employees? According to the Sheriff's CPA, that sounds like the only option they gave. Doesn't sound like they explored any other alternatives, such as decreased patrols, sell a drug-targeting helicopter, streamlining job tasks, etc. Sure, you could blame the increased cost of gasoline as taking money out of the paychecks of the deputies, but we've been close to $4/gal gas for a while, and there is such a thing as companies buying gas in large quantities at set prices, with deliveries to be in the future. Personally, I think that Sheriff Johnson should be working with deputies and employees, asking them ways in which they think they could cut money, without decreasing pay, or services. I think that the people doing the jobs will know best how to make their jobs more efficient.
On a side note, most deputies live north of the Bay just to be able to afford housing. The commute to and from work does burn much gas, I'm sure, but I don't know that I agree with the thought that parking a Patrol car at a deputies house, has been shown to decrease crime in rural areas, where they are living.
It is rather crazy that the sitting sheriff is the only person within the Sheriff's Office who has a say in a budget for a term in which he will not be a part. Republican Sheriff's candidate, Mike Adkinson was in attendance at the latest budget meeting, but he nor the Dem candidate will have no say in the matter.
Comm. Cindy Meadows didn't agree with the zero-increase budget for the Sheriff's Dept, noting that we shouldn't decrease the number of safety patrols, just to save a buck. She also noted that gas prices have increased, and that she thinks the money is somewhere in the budget (in the way of unspent, yet allocated money), to cover the $400,000 increase for which the Sheriff, via his CPA, was asking.