• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

County sued for $3 Million+

New posts
Bobby,
Lucky? Jolly Bay probably doesn't feel very Lucky. They would maybe agree with you they were Lucky if they would have been told the TRUTH from the county just ONE time in all the meetings they had with the county before the August 1 Technical Review Meeting. From 2004 till the day they were put on the TRC agenda for the August 1 meeting, the county told the taxpayers(applicants) there were no issues with the Jolly Bay project.
Jolly Bay met with county engineers and planners many times and were told in those meeting there was no height problem with the Jolly Bay site. George Newman, Greg Graham, Melissa Ward, Tim Brown and twice in two meetings With Lies LaSeur. Lies LaSeur told the applicant no problem with planning or zoning! so Jolly Bay kept spending time and money with her recommendations. Lies La Seur commented in those meeting that this was a great plan and she hadn't seen one come through planning as nice as this in a while. They staff report that was prepared for the August 1 2007 TRC states no compatibility study required, no height restrictions for this site, no neighborhood meeting needed, no mention of some book they would later find that says 8 stories is rural and 12 stories is urban.

Jolly Bay probably feels pretty UNLUCKY that they had to deal with a planning dept. that completely flip flopped on their own set of rules. How can us taxpayers use our government effectively when you have a planning department operating like this?

In the years this project was going thru planning where was Pat Blackshire? Lies LaSeur never said a word to her? Pat Blackshire never put out a memo for someone to tell the taxpayers (applicants) she had a problem.

You should probably feel UNLUCKY if you have to do business with Walton Co. Planning Dept. :yikes:

Just a heads up that you're not completely anonymous. If LaSeur wanted to sue for liable/slander she can get a court order to reveal your IP address, e-mail address, and any other pertinent information to find out who you are.
 
Just a heads up that you're not completely anonymous. If LaSeur wanted to sue for liable/slander she can get a court order to reveal your IP address, e-mail address, and any other pertinent information to find out who you are.

Maybe if Dragnet is one of the Plaintiffs in this case, LaSeur will opt to make a cross-claim for Libel. Maybe not.
 
Funny you all point this out. If the plaintiffs were watching this thread, wouldn't they have alot to pull from for thier own libel suit against your bantering on this thread:idontno:?
 
Last edited:
Funny you all point this out. If the plaintiffs were watching this thread, wouldn't they have alot to pull from for thier own libel suit against your bantering on this thread:idontno:?

How so? We are all stating opinion. Dragnet decided to go ahead and make a statement that someone was a liar.
 
Just a heads up that you're not completely anonymous. If LaSeur wanted to sue for liable/slander she can get a court order to reveal your IP address, e-mail address, and any other pertinent information to find out who you are.


Even if it is legal, common decency dictates that you do not call someone a liar without being prepared to prove it. Being anonymous is no excuse for being uncivil.
I would tend to agree with Dragnet on the issue, but I am turned off by his statement.
 
Even if it is legal, common decency dictates that you do not call someone a liar without being prepared to prove it. Being anonymous is no excuse for being uncivil.
I would tend to agree with Dragnet on the issue, but I am turned off by his statement.

Don't you mean "her" statement. :cool:
 
We did not plan on being silent. We did our job. We elected some free market thinkers, at least that is what they told us when they ran for office. Now that they are in it appears that they are forgetting those that believe in 'live and let live' and run for cover every time something a little bit controversial gets brought up.

If you truly believe this, why have you attended County Commissioner meetings at all? Your words speak differently than your actions.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top