I'm participating in the meeting remotely, as suggested. "Enforcement of Existing Regulations" and "Management of Outfall Issues" are top concerns.
About enforcement, I don't know the regulations or who is to enforce them. I think the regulations are in two plans that are being or were reconciled. Is there now one plan? As far as I know, the commissioners don't always follow the plans. Do they think it is important? Should they be held accountable? Come to think of it, I don't even know who is supposed to follow the regulations. That is how many county agencies, developers, residents, or visitors are involved? In the previous management plan meeting I attended, education was a big item, that applied to many topics. Perhaps "Information management" is a big key that precedes enforcing regulations. Could we have a big info map showing where the regulations reside, who they apply to, and who is to enforce them, all in block diagram?
At the moment, management of outfall issues seems an outgrowth of the previous. Unless we are talking about new regulations. Maybe all the old regulations need to be reconciled and updated in light of issues that have come up. How can you separate the outfall from the lake? It is like saying "neck issues" without mentioning the body and the head. But it is the crux. Can the science of lake monitoring help guide outfall issues? If so, will some people oppose it because it adds yet another bureaucratic burden to decisions made by the various agencies?