• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

For all my progressive, liberal friends out there...

New posts

GoodWitch58

Beach Fanatic
who are angry because President Obama "has not done enough..."

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/31/opinion/31kristof.html?_r=1&hp
Mr. Obama has been stellar in one area crucial to our country?s future: education. Democrats historically have been AWOL on school reform because they are beholden to teacher unions, but Mr. Obama has reframed the debate and made it safe to talk about teaching standards and ?bad teachers.? Until Mr. Obama, Democrats barely acknowledged that it was possible for a teacher to be bad.

Mr. Obama used stimulus money to keep teachers from being laid off and to nudge states to reform education so as to benefit children for years to come. His ?Race to the Top? focused states on education reform as never before.

He has also revamped and expanded student loans and bolstered support for community colleges, opening a new path to higher education for working-class Americans. Millions more Americans may end up in college.

Presidents in both parties have talked for years about the importance of education, but until now it has been lip service. Improving America?s inner-city schools will be a long slog, but Mr. Obama has done far more than any other president in this area ? arguably our single greatest national challenge. In my view, it?s his greatest achievement, and it has been largely ignored.
 
Last edited:
My problem with the Race to the top program is that it seems as though it is trying to get all states to buy into a one size fits all solution. Different states have different problems and different needs for their public education systems and while a national way of doing things might address the majority's problems, I worry too many will be left behind.

The Race to the top rewards states for expanding charter school programs. This is a classic one size fits all solution that fails to address the main problem in many states.

My academic life was saved by a charter school here in Walton County. And in this specific situation, the charter school has worked. The problem is in many places charter schools are not the solution, but Race to the Top still rewards them; thus punishing states that don't implement them.

One of the biggest problems in Texas public education today is the extremely fast growth of the Hispanic population in the southern part of the state. I think the legislature has worked admirably to try to find solutions to this problem that seems impossible to solve.

If this was in the Northeast instead of Texas, a good solution would be to open up charter schools. In the Northeast, a charter school can be opened and students can use public transportation to get there. The big problem with that is, even Texas's largest cities, the public transportation pales in comparison to the Northeast.

So because of public transportation, a great solution in the Northeast, does not work here in Texas. But Texas would need to implement more charter schools in order to compete for funding. That is why these national ways to fix education are so bogus; what works somewhere may not work somewhere else.

Just to add, Texas does have a very large charter school program, but its purpose is more to address inner-city problems rather than the southern growing population problem.
 
My problem with the Race to the top program is that it seems as though it is trying to get all states to buy into a one size fits all solution. Different states have different problems and different needs for their public education systems and while a national way of doing things might address the majority's problems, I worry too many will be left behind.

The Race to the top rewards states for expanding charter school programs. This is a classic one size fits all solution that fails to address the main problem in many states.

My academic life was saved by a charter school here in Walton County. And in this specific situation, the charter school has worked. The problem is in many places charter schools are not the solution, but Race to the Top still rewards them; thus punishing states that don't implement them.

One of the biggest problems in Texas public education today is the extremely fast growth of the Hispanic population in the southern part of the state. I think the legislature has worked admirably to try to find solutions to this problem that seems impossible to solve.

If this was in the Northeast instead of Texas, a good solution would be to open up charter schools. In the Northeast, a charter school can be opened and students can use public transportation to get there. The big problem with that is, even Texas's largest cities, the public transportation pales in comparison to the Northeast.

So because of public transportation, a great solution in the Northeast, does not work here in Texas. But Texas would need to implement more charter schools in order to compete for funding. That is why these national ways to fix education are so bogus; what works somewhere may not work somewhere else.

Just to add, Texas does have a very large charter school program, but its purpose is more to address inner-city problems rather than the southern growing population problem.

Kind of like that asinine FCAT program and leave no child behind?

Transportation doesn't seem to be a problem here, South Walton is the only area that has seen an increase in students. All 4 schools have gone up while the North end and even surrounding counties have dropped.
 
My problem with the Race to the top program is that it seems as though it is trying to get all states to buy into a one size fits all solution. Different states have different problems and different needs for their public education systems and while a national way of doing things might address the majority's problems, I worry too many will be left behind.

The Race to the top rewards states for expanding charter school programs. This is a classic one size fits all solution that fails to address the main problem in many states.

My academic life was saved by a charter school here in Walton County. And in this specific situation, the charter school has worked. The problem is in many places charter schools are not the solution, but Race to the Top still rewards them; thus punishing states that don't implement them.

One of the biggest problems in Texas public education today is the extremely fast growth of the Hispanic population in the southern part of the state. I think the legislature has worked admirably to try to find solutions to this problem that seems impossible to solve.

If this was in the Northeast instead of Texas, a good solution would be to open up charter schools. In the Northeast, a charter school can be opened and students can use public transportation to get there. The big problem with that is, even Texas's largest cities, the public transportation pales in comparison to the Northeast.

So because of public transportation, a great solution in the Northeast, does not work here in Texas. But Texas would need to implement more charter schools in order to compete for funding. That is why these national ways to fix education are so bogus; what works somewhere may not work somewhere else.

Just to add, Texas does have a very large charter school program, but its purpose is more to address inner-city problems rather than the southern growing population problem.

Perhaps you know more of the details of this than I do, but my reading of the information does not seem to indicate a reward of charter schools over any other plan. It is my understanding that it is the state that must come up with the plan, and it must be in accordance with state laws, and signed off on by the state department of education...charter schools are included, but no where do I see they get more preference than any other portion of a plan. In the situation in Texas, would it not be up to the Texas department of education to design a plan that took in all regions? I am sure that the Florida plan considered the difference in Miami and South Walton when it wrote the plan...:idontno:
Race to the Top Fund
 
Perhaps you know more of the details of this than I do, but my reading of the information does not seem to indicate a reward of charter schools over any other plan. It is my understanding that it is the state that must come up with the plan, and it must be in accordance with state laws, and signed off on by the state department of education...charter schools are included, but no where do I see they get more preference than any other portion of a plan. In the situation in Texas, would it not be up to the Texas department of education to design a plan that took in all regions? I am sure that the Florida plan considered the difference in Miami and South Walton when it wrote the plan...:idontno:
Race to the Top Fund

General Selection Criteria (55 total points)
Ensuring successful conditions for high-performing charters and other innovative schools (40 points)

So charter schools are worth 40 points out of the 500 possible points a state can earn. That punishes states where charter schools are not the best option for their particular circumstances.
 
thanks for isolating that...I still don't see a problem though. ..and it says, Charter schools or other innovative....doesn't seem like a mandate for charter schools.

It looks as though whatever the state thinks is best can be proposed; and in most cases I would think it would be a combination of programs, designed to fit the particular need.

I don't interpret that to mean states must have a charter school--but, as I said, maybe I am missing something in the details.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top