• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Foreclosed homes could become hurricane shelters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Em
  • Start date Start date
New posts

Em

Beach Fanatic
Foreclosed homes could become hurricane shelters
(from The Associated Press, Lisa Orkin Emmanuel)


MIAMI (AP) ? June 4, 2009 ? Trying to make the best of a bad situation, federal officials might use foreclosed homes as temporary housing for hurricane evacuees in Florida as soon as this summer.

The proposal would keep people close to their homes and communities instead of scattering them around the country, which happened when Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans nearly four years ago. Thousands never returned.

But the idea is still in its infancy and many questions remain unanswered, including whether the banks that own the foreclosed homes would agree to such a plan.

?It makes all the sense in the world,? said Jack McCabe, a South Florida real estate analyst, who has watched tens of thousands of homes go into foreclosure. ?We have a lot of vacant units available.?

The Federal Emergency Management Agency told The Associated Press that it might consider using foreclosed homes if hotels, shelters and other housing options are full and only for a catastrophic situation, such as Hurricane Katrina. The idea was discussed at a hurricane drill this week in Florida.

Jeff Bryant, FEMA?s federal coordinating officer for Florida, said the agency will work with other federal agencies such as Housing and Urban Development and state emergency planners to see if it could be a solution.

If the proposal works in Florida, it could serve as a model nationally. In April, there were 278,287 homes in some stage of foreclosure in Florida, according to RealtyTrac. The idea isn?t wholly new: about 100 families were moved into foreclosed homes after Katrina, FEMA said.

?When you have a diaspora that leaves the state, it?s very hard to get those guys back. You really want to prevent them from leaving the state,? Bryant said. ?We want to keep them in their same local community.?

FEMA would likely contact banks, other mortgage holders and their representatives to compile a list of available homes. The evacuees would then be assigned homes close to their own, and FEMA would use a contractor, acting as its agent, to pay rent directly to whoever owns the home, said Jon Arno, FEMA?s individual assistance branch director for Florida. His duties include finding temporary housing for disaster victims.

If there is a consenting landlord and a legitimate tenant then there should not be any legal problems, said Chris Lafakis, an economist specializing in Florida and the housing market at Moody?s Economy.com.

?I think that it should be viewed more of a moral issue,? Lafakis said, ?what?s best for displaced homeowners, than as a sparkplug for the Florida housing market.?

Ruben Almaguer, the interim director of the state?s Division of Emergency Management, said he wants FEMA to fast track looking into the option for this hurricane season, which began Monday.

But there could be snags. McCabe said using foreclosed homes might be too costly and complex.

?Could FEMA react quickly enough in concert with the developers and lenders to come to agreements to utilize the vacant housing units for the temporary needs of hurricane victims?? he asked.

Another problem, said attorney Roy Oppenheim, is that neighbors might not want strange families moving in. But a displaced family would be better than squatters, and he thinks banks would look favorably on the idea.

Bank of America spokeswoman Jumana Bauwens said ?we would have to see more details, but it is something we would consider.? Other banks said they would want to see plans before commenting.

Some Katrina refugees said they wish they would have had the option. Angelo Edwards, who just returned to New Orleans from Houston three months ago, said it helps everyone.

?It provides income to the bank, the person who holds the deed ... It?s taking some of that inventory out of the market,? he said. ?With this program they could keep that family unit together.?

Cindy Bartholomae left New Orleans with her five children and eventually ended up in North Carolina without her husband, who stayed behind to work as a deputy. When she returned to New Orleans in 2006 they lived in trailer for a year.

?If I had a place to stay that was closer it would have been so much easier for me,? she said. ?I just felt separated. My kids were lonely. They missed their dad.?
 
It's a creative idea, but implementation would be tricky and I imagine costly. If it is a possible solution, why did they only do 100 post-Katrina?

My big questions:
Why do the banks want to do this? Are they set up to rent or is FEMA the property manager now? Who is liable for any damage to the homes or injuries evacuees sustain while there? Who is paying to get water and power to these homes?

What about the families who were "displaced" from their communities when their homes were foreclosed upon?
 
Since the gov't owns a good portion of the financial institutions who own these foreclosed properties it should be no trouble for them to just dictate that the homes be used for this purpose; at no cost of course ( social conscience being what it is ) . Then you and I can be on the hook for all related costs ( unless you think that somebody given something for nothing is going to take care of it ). Never trust the gov't to do the right thing unless it is self-serving.
 
I would certainly like to have foreclosed homes being used, especially by hardworking people in need, instead of sitting there as vacant eyesores, just don't understand exactly how it would work.

If we can use foreclosed homes as emergency housing, why wouldn't we/the banks use them for non-emergency housing? There are foreclosed homes all over the country, and the odds of a catastrophic event hitting are low (and would only affect that small area).
 
I wonder if locals who cannot afford their own mortgage loose their house in a storm, can upgrade, free of charge, fully funded by FEMA. Hmmm?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top