Kimmifunn
Funnkalicious
Here is a little scoop on Reece's dress...And a few extra funn items for you gossip fodders!
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm
I wouldn't doubt it! Bet she shrugged it off and/or had a good laugh about it.Tootsie said:Drew is quirky and I have a feeling she doesn't care too much about being voted worst dressed. for some reason, she liked that frumpy seaweed color dress - heck - she probably was in some secret contest with her starlet friends to see who could snag worst dressed title...
Kimmifunn said:Here is a little scoop on Reece's dress...And a few extra funn items for you gossip fodders!
http://www.nypost.com/gossip/pagesix/pagesix.htm
John R said:kim, can you copy/paste the article? need a login.
jr
jr is a gossip hound 
I thought the dress was so pretty, but it was very ill-fitting in the top. Made me a little sad cause I love her.Kimmifunn said:Here you go Johnny R!
January 18, 2006 -- IT doesn't sound possible, but Chanel managed to turn Reese Witherspoon into a fashion victim at the Golden Globes.
Witherspoon, who won Best Actress for "Walk the Line," wore a white-and-silver "vintage" Chanel dress - only to find out it was a mere 3 years old and that Kirsten Dunst wore the same frock to Globes after-parties back in 2003. Whoops!
Witherspoon's rep, Nancy Ryder, is said to be so angry at Chanel for giving her a recently recycled gown that she's vowing not to accept anything from Chanel again - or let her other clients, including Jennifer Lopez and Ren?e Zellweger, wear anything from the French couture house.
Ryder said, "Reese was told the dress was vintage. It was not. I'm not angry - just a little disappointed, but the big deal is Reese won the Golden Globe."
can someone find/post a pic. of it?peapod1980 said:I thought the dress was so pretty, but it was very ill-fitting in the top. Made me a little sad cause I love her.