• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

I'll concede

New posts

Matt J

SWGB
To not using the term "Tea Bagger's". I will only refer to them as the Tea Party from now on. They showed last night that, outside of Kentucky, they're not all total loons by rejecting Angle and O'Donnell.

Please understand that those are the types of Tea Partiers that are the most worrisome. It's like electing a schizophrenic on LSD, you never know what crazies going to pop up next.
 
I agree there's whackos on all sides, always will be.
 
Just wondering, what about Ran Paul bothers you so much ?

Where to begin?

Anyone who can't get accredited for their medical profession who goes out and starts their own accreditation organization.

His comments regarding the BP spill.

He's against the fair housing act.

Aqua Buddha

He wants to eliminate the Department of Education

He thinks government is to blame for rising health costs, when it's been proven to be insurance (both patient and malpractice), big pharma, and lawyers.

and last, but not least!

That toupee :puke:
 
To not using the term "Tea Bagger's". I will only refer to them as the Tea Party from now on. They showed last night that, outside of Kentucky, they're not all total loons by rejecting Angle and O'Donnell.

Please understand that those are the types of Tea Partiers that are the most worrisome. It's like electing a schizophrenic on LSD, you never know what crazies going to pop up next.

Like, "I have trouble listening to what Dick Cheney says sometimes, because of the blood that drips from his teeth while he's talking...." - Alan Grayson, formerly of the Tea Party.

Oh, wait, no. That's a Democrat.
 
Like, "I have trouble listening to what Dick Cheney says sometimes, because of the blood that drips from his teeth while he's talking...." - Alan Grayson, formerly of the Tea Party.

Oh, wait, no. That's a Democrat.

Alan Grayson is an embarrassment to Democrats. Enough said. Should we make a list of embarrassing candidates for all three (?) parties. Not sure we have enough paper...
 
To not using the term "Tea Bagger's". I will only refer to them as the Tea Party from now on. They showed last night that, outside of Kentucky, they're not all total loons by rejecting Angle and O'Donnell.

Please understand that those are the types of Tea Partiers that are the most worrisome. It's like electing a schizophrenic on LSD, you never know what crazies going to pop up next.
stockholm sowal syndrome?
 
To not using the term "Tea Bagger's". I will only refer to them as the Tea Party from now on. They showed last night that, outside of Kentucky, they're not all total loons by rejecting Angle and O'Donnell.

Please understand that those are the types of Tea Partiers that are the most worrisome. It's like electing a schizophrenic on LSD, you never know what crazies going to pop up next.


Uh-oh. This explains a lot. I don't do a lot of TV lately so Y'all are my news, mostly. I've seen 'Baggers' so much here, I actually used the term yesterday. :floor: I got an evil eye, but was truly baffled. :lol: Must laugh in spite of myself and pay attention to paying closer attention in the future.
 
Thank you

To not using the term "Tea Bagger's". I will only refer to them as the Tea Party from now on. They showed last night that, outside of Kentucky, they're not all total loons by rejecting Angle and O'Donnell.

Please understand that those are the types of Tea Partiers that are the most worrisome. It's like electing a schizophrenic on LSD, you never know what crazies going to pop up next.

Thank you. I appreciate your effort.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top