• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Important Call to Action Regarding our Coastal Dune Lakes

New posts
I've been to several meetings on this issue, and that is the way the ordinance reads: if your house was destroyed, you would only be able to build back to the 25% footprint, even if your house had been larger than 25% since 1951 or whatever.

And we aren't just talking about the house footprint. We are talking about walkways,driveways, etc.

These are some of the provisions that need tweaking. I don't think anyone is talking about wholesale scrapping of the ordinance. Just giving some long time residents some assurance that their property isn't being de-valued.

Can anyone give us some insight on what exactly happened at the meeting?
 
I have to wonder how many people bought these lots without being informed about the 25% restrictions.
 
Yes, that's an important point. The ordinance has been on the books for a long time, but has only been enforced during the last ten months.
 
Last edited:
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top