• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Interim-Director Agreement for TDC

New posts
We found the whole agreement interesting. It went through 34 revisions to get to where it is. When you see the metadata on the file you can see the changes made on each edit session. The document is vastly different from the original draft with whole provisions added, deleted and changed.

We will make a presentation at the next BCC meeting to express our viewpoint on specific provisions.

This is a quote from Commissioner C Jones that appeared on WJHG last evening.

"Where the confusion probably came in-- Dawn, to me, and the chamber are kind of synonymous. Whenever I made my motion, I was in hopes..And maybe I didn't clarify myself as well as I should of, but I was looking at Dawn Moliterno to step in as an interim until we can hire a full time new director."

Her original motion, which was read from a prepared statement, was for the "Chamber" to serve as the public/private entity to manage the TDC.

It was only after public comment that they agreed to add a proviso to begin a search.

You noted that this document has been through 34 revisions. Does the Metadata information give you the date the document was originally started.....like maybe before the meeting the other night? Does it note who made the changes?

Curious. ;-)
 
Last edited:
I'm still wondering why "THE Beach" is being pumped. I thought they were done. However, they are featured on the Chamber's site and the TDC site, and they are about to get some money from the TDC for the "Taste of THE Beach" according to the upcoming BCC agenda.

Wasn't Dawn recently appointed to sit on the new ECP airport board for Walton County? I've seen no one directly mentioning that. Seems to be nothing more than a big potential conflict of interest to me. It appears that the players in THE Beach still having a large stake in the game, and that there is too much potential for much money to be funneled directly back to those players. In my limited view point, this is a bad idea. It has nothing to do with Dawn directly, as I don't know anything about her. The bad part comes in the structure of the proposed arrangement, with one person having way too much authority and representing a group of specific private businesses on behalf the TDC.
 
I'm still wondering why "THE Beach" is being pumped. I thought they were done. However, they are featured on the Chamber's site and the TDC site, and they are about to get some money from the TDC for the "Taste of THE Beach" according to the upcoming BCC agenda.

Wasn't Dawn recently appointed to sit on the new ECP airport board for Walton County? I've seen no one directly mentioning that. Seems to be nothing more than a big potential conflict of interest to me. It appears that the players in THE Beach still having a large stake in the game, and that there is too much potential for much money to be funneled directly back to those players. In my limited view point, this is a bad idea. It has nothing to do with Dawn directly, as I don't know anything about her. The bad part comes in the structure of the proposed arrangement, with one person having way too much authority and representing a group of specific private businesses on behalf the TDC.

Exactly. As I asked in my post above: how can this not be a conflict of interest? And, it does not matter who the individual is--the structure of this agreement can not be the right thing to do, if one is concerned about how the tax payers' money is being spent...at least not in a normal universe.

If I were in charge, I'd be asking: who benefits the most from this arrangement and is that what we want to do?
 
Last edited:
You noted that this document has been through 34 revisions. Does the Metadata information give you the date the document was originally started.....like maybe before the meeting the other night? Does it note who made the changes?

Curious. ;-)
The file was originally created by Karen Shehan on 3/17/2010 at 3:27 pm.

Yes you see all changes. All 34 edit sessions are available by who opened the file and who made the changes.

The original agreement was created in the HR department not the Legal Department.

Tonight we had call that another newer version is floating around through the commissioners and we will pursue that document tomorrow. This is unconfirmed but the source has been very reliable.
 
Last edited:
Ash and taxpayers Association,
I just tried looking at the metadata on one of my word files.
It is nice but most people do not start from a new blank document everytime they make a contract. I noticed that when I saved the file under a new name that some of the metadata caried over from the previous file. That is good but could cause the number of edits and time spent editing to reflect that the original file was edited a great many times to fit many different criteria. For instance if this was a contract originally made for use for a consultant for engineering work it could have mutated into a contract for planning consultation and then to the current document. I may be way off but that would explain the large number of revisions and the large amount of time reported in the metadata file. Also I am using office 2003 so these characteristics may be different on newer versions of word.

I do not think that putting the TDC under the same person who is in charge of the chamber is a good idea. Too much chance of conflicts in interest. Who will she really be promoting? I think there should be someone from inside the TDC who can act as interum while a search goes on for a permenant director.
 
Last edited:
It's clear to me - another fight between the people who want more, more , more (money) and those who want decent schools, roads, police, fire service, a nice place to live, quality of life.

Let's not be like most every other american city. Let's be the best we can be. Enough is enough! the folks who are trying to sell us to the highest bidder need to stop and listen to the people instead. Make your voices heard!
 
I'm still wondering why "THE Beach" is being pumped. I thought they were done. However, they are featured on the Chamber's site and the TDC site, and they are about to get some money from the TDC for the "Taste of THE Beach" according to the upcoming BCC agenda.

Wasn't Dawn recently appointed to sit on the new ECP airport board for Walton County? I've seen no one directly mentioning that. Seems to be nothing more than a big potential conflict of interest to me. It appears that the players in THE Beach still having a large stake in the game, and that there is too much potential for much money to be funneled directly back to those players. In my limited view point, this is a bad idea. It has nothing to do with Dawn directly, as I don't know anything about her. The bad part comes in the structure of the proposed arrangement, with one person having way too much authority and representing a group of specific private businesses on behalf the TDC.

Great points about the the beach. The same players are pushing for this, and we all know what happened to that campaign - it faded into the sunset. Yes, she's on the airport board in Bay County. I find it interesting how many people on these boards talk about not knowing her or anything about her, and yet she's the chamber president. Everyone who knows anything about the chamber right now knows they are struggling mightily. And now they commission wants to pay her to manage the TDC. Which I don't understand. Why pay someone $6700 dollars to consult and manage when there are 30 plus employees there, any of whom could serve as interim because they have the knowledge and experience? Maybe they can pay her to figure out the overbilling on the garbage pick up too.
 
techpyle said:
I think there should be someone from inside the TDC who can act as interum while a search goes on for a permenant director.

From what I understand, there already is someone from within the TDC acting as Interim Director, and I also understand that several of the current TDC Board members feel as though she is very capable of handling that position on at least an interim basis, while a search is conducted for an Executive Director. Unless the acting Interim Director doesn't want to serve, why do people keep saying we need to find an Interim Director?
 
The file was originally created by Karen Shehan on 3/17/2010 at 3:27 pm.

Yes you see all changes. All 34 edit sessions are available by who opened the file and who made the changes.

The original agreement was created in the HR department not the Legal Department.

Tonight we had call that another newer version is floating around through the commissioners and we will pursue that document tomorrow. This is unconfirmed but the source has been very reliable.

So is this the timeline:

1. March 17,2010: Document generated to place COC over TDC because the TDC Director suddenly retired.
2. April 1, 2010: TDC Director suddenly retires.
3. April 9, 2010: County Attorney is directed to generate a draft agreement for COC to assume operation of TDC.

Is this correct or have I missed something?
 
http://defuniakherald.com/?p=1952

By DOTTY NIST

Will the management of South Walton Tourist Development Council and the Walton County Chamber of Commerce soon be linked together, at least on an interim basis? County commissioners are to soon consider action on that possibility.

The first public discussion of oversight of the TDC by the chamber took place at the April 13 Walton County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) regular meeting. A motion to approve the plan carried 4-1 at the meeting, in the absence of any written contract for the agreement being presented. However that motion was later withdrawn because public comment had not been taken prior to the vote.

Discussion of the possibility began when Gary Mattison, county human resources director, approached the commissioners at the April 13 meeting. Mattison asked for direction from the BCC due to his recently having received and accepted the “early retirement notice” of Sonny Mares. Mares served as TDC executive director from May 2008 until April 2, 2010.

Mattison noted that upon Mares’ departure, TDC Director of Communication Tracy Louthain was immediately put in place as interim director. “She is serving very admirably in that position,” he said. Mattison added that cooperation with other county departments was enlisted to support Louthain with her duties.

District 5 Commissioner Cecilia Jones asked Mattison to present the options for ways of moving forward.

Mattison explained that when the TDC director position was previously vacant, a search committee was created to find a new director, and candidates were sought nationwide. He estimated that it would take three to six months to get a new director on board through this process.

”We don’t want to get bogged down in looking for someone,” Jones responded. She asked if partnering with the chamber of commerce and the drawing upon the expertise of Dawn Moliterno, chamber director/CEO, for leadership and monitoring of the TDC would not be an option.

”Certainly that would be an option,” Mattison replied.

The commissioners discussed the need for strong leadership in the tourism arena at this particular time due to the new Northwest Florida Beaches International Airport opening in less than six weeks and Southwest Airlines bringing low-cost air travel to the area at that time.

“It’s a crucial time,” County Commission Chairman Scott Brannon observed. He said he had spoken with Maurice Gilbert, TDC chairman, and had shared with him similar thoughts about an interim chamber/TDC partnership.

Brannon said he would support “pooling resources” in that way and “moving toward that critical date,” when the airport opens.

Cecilia Jones then made a motion to enter an agreement with the chamber to have the organization “oversee the operations of the TDC” on an interim basis. The motion was seconded and a vote was quickly taken. The motion passed 4-1, with District 3 Commissioner Larry Jones voting no.

During much of the discussion, Walton County Taxpayers Association (WCTA) President Bob Hudson had been standing at the front of the meeting room prepared to provide input. Hudson then objected that no public comment period had been provided prior to the vote. Brannon apologized, saying that he had not seen Hudson standing there, and Cecilia Jones withdrew her motion, negating the vote just taken.


Taking the lectern, Hudson referenced “very shocking” allegations regarding spending of (tourist) tax dollars by the TDC administration that had surfaced during the past week. “We need an effective TDC,” Hudson told the commissioners, adding that spending issues must be addressed.

In addition to the audit of TDC credit card activity recently initiated by the BCC, Hudson called for the suspension of all TDC employee credit cards until such time as adequate oversight procedures are developed, a review of all TDC contracts, and a review of TDC advisory board composition.

Hudson raised strong opposition to placing the operation of the TDC “under the control” of the chamber or any other private entity.

The Walton County Chamber of Commerce is a private organization funded primarily through memberships.

The establishment of the TDC, a public entity, was required by state law prior to Walton County initiating the collection of the tourist development tax (bed tax). County voters approved the imposition of that tax on short-term rentals south of the bay by referendum in 1986, legally establishing the Local Option Tourist Development Act in Walton County. Currently the organization has a yearly budget of approximately $12 million, with that funding being provided through the bed tax rather than ad valorem taxes.

Malcolm Patterson, Walton County’s first TDC director and one who held that position for a decade, addressed the commissioners. He urged attention to three factors with the organization: leadership, communication, and oversight. “If those are addressed, your problems will be solved,” Patterson commented. He explained that during his years at the helm, a TDC board member rigorously reviewed all directors’ and employees’ expenditures before they were submitted to the county for payment.

Patterson then expressed concern at the possibility of “turning the operations of the TDC over to a private organization” (the chamber). He observed that there are “a few” TDCs in the state that are managed by chambers of commerce. Most of these, he said, are too small to “stand alone” without the chamber.

There is a big difference between TDCs and chambers of commerce, Patterson continued, and that is that TDCs operate on “dedicated revenues” (the tourist or bed tax). While chambers may have some dedicated revenues, he said, for the most part they must raise money in order to fund their operations.

While noting that he always had excellent relations with the chamber of commerce as TDC director, Patterson emphasized that “there is a clear distinction” between a private organization such as the chamber and a “public entity” such as the TDC. He added that by law there are strict restrictions on how TDC moneys are expended….

Read the full story in the April 22, 2010 edition of the Herald Breeze.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top