• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

"It was a breeze to get approved."

New posts

30ashopper

SoWal Insider
?There has been all kinds of help for housing. I?m not unappreciative,? said Barb Swartley, president of the Elkhart County Board of Realtors. ?But you can?t turn real estate into a government-sponsored operation forever.?

Many in Washington agree. With worries about the deficit intensifying, the government is eager to start withdrawing some of its support programs.

The first step could happen as early as next month, when the Federal Reserve has said it will end its trillion-dollar program to buy up mortgage securities. That program has driven mortgage interest rates to lows not seen since the 1950s.

Yet it is uncertain whether the government can really pull back without sending housing markets into another tailspin. ?A rise in rates would kill us all by itself,? Ms. Swartley said.

The Obama administration has offered few ideas about reforming the housing market. Proposals for the future of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the mortgage holding companies taken over by the government at the height of the crisis, were supposed to be introduced with the president?s budget this month. They were not.

The government programs, however crucial, are distorting the market. The tax credit produced sales last fall, but some lenders here say it has troubling implications.

?People are buying to get that tax credit, to get some reserve money. They?re saying, ?If something happens, I will have a little bit of money to fall back on,? ? said Denny Davis of Horizon Bank in Elkhart. ?That?s not healthy.?

The programs favor first-time buyers, who have the fewest resources to bring to a deal. Heather Stevens, a 23-year-old nurse here, is closing on a three-bedroom house this week. Since her loan was insured by the Federal Housing Administration, she had to put down only 3.5 percent of the $74,900 purchase price.

?It was a breeze to get approved,? she said.

The sellers are covering her closing costs, which agents say is often the case here. That meant Ms. Stevens had to come up with only the $2,600 down payment, which still took all her savings.

But the best part is the $7,500 tax credit. She will use that to remodel the kitchen. ?If it wasn?t for the credit, we would have waited to buy,? said Ms. Stevens, who is getting married this year.

In Elkhart, Ind., Fear for the Day When Housing Aid Ends - NYTimes.com

Thrice the brinded cat hath mew'd.
Thrice and once, the hedge-pig whin'd.
Harpier cries, 'tis time! 'tis time!
Round about the caldron go;
In the poison'd entrails throw.?
Toad, that under cold stone,
Days and nights has thirty-one;
Swelter'd venom sleeping got,
Boil thou first i' the charmed pot!

Double, double toil and trouble;
Fire burn, and caldron bubble.
 
Glad to see people have learned their lesson - NOT~! :bang:

New plan - I have to approve loans/mortgages!

And someone who only has $2,600 in savings will NOT be buying a house! :angry:
 
Glad to see people have learned their lesson - NOT~! :bang:

New plan - I have to approve loans/mortgages!

And someone who only has $2,600 in savings will NOT be buying a house! :angry:



First contact should be FHA. Typically, the amount of savings required is a function of the new housing expense. But, FHA will still back a loan with only one months' reserves. :blink:
 
Sorry, but crap like this is what is really pissing people off.

I recognize that there are sometimes unforeseen circumstances and we all could use some temporary help in those situations ...................... but it just seems like people didn't learn a damn thing and are repeating and compounding the dumb arse financial decisions that got our country into the current financial cluster.
 
There is no majic pill out there to get our financial house in order. What has to happen is a realization that things must corrected before the recovery can begin. These bandaids are only postponing what must eventially occur.
 
Neil Barofsky, the special inspector general for the government’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, wrote in his most recent report to Congress that “the federal government’s concerted efforts to support” housing prices “risk reinflating” the bubble.

He noted one difference from the last bubble: taxpayers, rather than banks, are now directly at risk in these new mortgages.

I wonder if anyone in Congress actually read that report? Probably not.
 
There is no majic pill out there to get our financial house in order. What has to happen is a realization that things must corrected before the recovery can begin. These bandaids are only postponing what must eventially occur.

I know. It's almost as if we need to take the pill/medicine and muddle through the imminent inflation to set corrections and proper path.


I wonder if anyone in Congress actually read that report? Probably not.

Highly dubious.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top