Bob Wells
Beach Fanatic
Good points I suppose, but if the law says you must then shouldn't you. I am more than willing to abide by what the judge says.Then the blind trust itself should be listed, not its contents. If it's a blind trust, the politician is not beholden to those unknown companies and can't use his office to benefit them. If he doesn't know what's in it, why do we need to? If the contents were public, it wouldn't be a blind trust anymore, and the politician might be tempted to favor those investments over yours. Do you want to criticize the trustee's investment decisions that the beneficiary didn't know about?