tw512, you make a good point and we have surfers in CA waters who risk life and limb for the big waves every day. But the burden of informing inexperienced swimmers has to be considered, as do the costs to the taxpayers. I know that sounds callous, but there is a lot of money spent to rescue people in danger, many of whom thought they were "up to it."
There is also the old argument that a stronger swimmer is often the one who loses his or her life in a rip tide, based on the assumption that a less experienced swimmer does not have the skill or strength to fight against the rip tide, is more inclined to allow themselves to be pulled along until the rip tide releases them. I have heard that point made many times over the years. Have no idea how true it might or might not be. I would assume that an informed person, regardless of their swimming skills or strength, would be a safer person.
In any event, the preponderance of people going into the waters in spite of red flags, would seem that the option you desire clearly exists.
There is also the old argument that a stronger swimmer is often the one who loses his or her life in a rip tide, based on the assumption that a less experienced swimmer does not have the skill or strength to fight against the rip tide, is more inclined to allow themselves to be pulled along until the rip tide releases them. I have heard that point made many times over the years. Have no idea how true it might or might not be. I would assume that an informed person, regardless of their swimming skills or strength, would be a safer person.
In any event, the preponderance of people going into the waters in spite of red flags, would seem that the option you desire clearly exists.
...and people are worried about sharks!