AAbsolute
Banned
just as we were told bac was a steal at $25 or wachovia was a can't miss at $20. prices are simply supply and demand. nothing more nothing less. the nation is in turmoil and unfortunately 2nd homes are the first thing to go. and 30-a was a massive bubble no different than vegas or california. there's a personal attachment for many on here with 30a just as people were attached to wachovia or bank of america. but no matter what anyone says there's a breaking pt were the lose is too great and you dump it. lets use the watercolor example. obviously price per square foot prices are crashing all over 30-a. already we've seen sub $300 in watercolor and before this is over we could see a lot of $300 per square foot on the upper end homes in there that are still trying to get $500 and above.my pt is there's 100's of homes in watercolor that were bought for $500-$1000 per square foot. what happens to the fat cat that bought his watercolor 4k square home for $3.4 mil in 2005 and its worth $1.8 mil now? his business at home has collapsed and his cost per month to pay for and maintain his watercolor home is $10k per month. he's down $1.6 mil so the answer is obvious. It's gone. thats what makes this collapse so hard to end. there's literally 1000's of people on 30-a in that same situation so when those homes are dumped and sold in foreclosure they are the new per square foot price to measure new sales against.ITS A VICIOUS CIRCLE OF DECLINES ON TOP OF DECLINES JUST AS THE UPSIDE WAS VICIOUS ON GAINS ON TOP OF GAINS. its painful and could last many more years. i think by the end of 2009 there will be tons of homes and condo's in the $250 range per square ft.
Do you think that sale prices will drop below a point where a mortgage payment can be paid by the value of the rental income?