GoodWitch58
Beach Fanatic
I so agree. What do you think it would take to get more attention to the "real" issues, and less to the nonsense?
I so agree. What do you think it would take to get more attention to the "real" issues, and less to the nonsense?


Maybe a few right wing elites threw the term socialism around referring to Hillarycare while dressing in the country club locker room. But it did NOT even come close to making it into mainstream conversation.
What did make the mainstream (and ended up being surprisingly effective) was a tv commercial produced by the insurance lobby which depicted a middle aged couple expressing their concern over the "bureaucratic nature" of HillaryCare.
Go ahead and do a quick search for papers and post mortems on why HillaryCare failed. You will be hard pressed to find the usage of the term "socialism" in anything that wasn't recently written.
The McCain campaign realized that the word socialism evoked fear in lots of "real americans" when it was applied to "that one".
The good news for folks who voted for Obama is that hope trumped fear. The bad news for the country is that fear ate its Wheaties after the November beating the GOP took and it remains a common thread to scare the uninformed.
There is a reason why you didn't hear Joe the Plumber call Obama's ideas progressive instead of liberal. Just as there is a reason you didn't hear him call him a social democrat instead of a socialist.
You are clearly smart enough to articulate nonemotional objections to a social democratic model. Most Americans aren't.
But when you and the pundits cleverly swap the term socialism/socialist with social democrat the concepts change for the masses and end up eliciting the emotional response of fear- which then ends up trumping all logic and reason.
You are clearly smart enough to see the point I make about the usage of the fear inducing term "socialism"as being valid but for some reason you are resisting and instead repeating your talking points about all of the "social terms" being valid critiques of Obama's politics (which they are).
Quit. Would you please?
Here's a new one I like-
Soccer moms and tradesmen are doing on camera interviews saying they don't want their kids exposed to the president's speech because they "oppose the indoctrination of our youth into liberal socialism".
Puulease. That language wasn't used by these folks until it was scared into them.
SOCIALISM = FEAR
FEAR = ACTION
This is what the GOP is going with...
I really don't know - If I knew, I'd do it. Biting my tongue, ignoring, redirecting, distracting, calls for civility and common sense, and introducing non-political topics don't seem to do much.
Someone said "We'll achieve peace in the Middle East when we realize we love our children more than we hate our enemies."
Maybe we'll stop squabbling when we realize "We love our country and our children's futures more than we hate the other politicial party?"
Sadly, I think it would have to be something extreme (like 9-11) to make people get a long overdue reality/priority check (and even that was short lived). It just seems like the sniping and politricks gets worse every day and it isn't doing our country or us any good.

I don't care if Obama gives a speech a week to the kids regarding working hard and staying in school. What I do object to is the DOE materials that ask for essays on " How can I help the President" and such. Totally unnacceptable. My gosh, even Chris Mathews said this morning that this was too far and wrong. (Source Morning Joe)
wonder where he stands on the "What I did over my summer vacation" essay? okay only if student did nothing involving politics or off limits all together? Anyone remember when education was education?
When has whipped up fear of the extreme not been a part of our political landscape? What are you complaining about exactly, the fact that a political party is using fear of extemes to build it's support or the fact that the republicans are the ones doing it successfully today?
YouTube - LBJ Daisy ad