• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Racist Anti-Mosquers

New posts
Ron Hart's thoughts from his recent column (link):

"Clearly, they have a "right? to build it. But surely they cannot be so tone-deaf that they don't realize building a monument two blocks from where genocide in the name of Islam was committed against innocent Americans will deal a major setback to their purported cause of "interreligious understanding and tolerance...."

I say we build a Jimmy Dean?s Sausage store on one side of the site and a strip club on the other (with a sign on the door: "Only Arab Chicks Need Apply"). Better yet, maybe Nick Vergos could open another Rendezvous restaurant down the street and serve his famous ribs. The smell of pork being smoked would waft into the air for blocks.

We could also fund a movie theater that only shows Kevin Bacon movies across the street, and a sports bar that only shows Mia Hamm reruns. You get the idea...."

********************
The short is that it isn't up to the government to decide whether or not a mosque is built according to the constitution. It is up to the people. Last time I checked, Amendment 1 also covers the freedom of speech, and it is people's right to protest. So what? Protest is the American right and we all need to use it more frequently. If you don't like something, speak up. I could care less whether or not a mosque is built in NYC. It doesn't affect me in any way, just like someone building a high rise in South Walton shouldn't affect people living in Oregon. It's non of their business. Keep it local and in perspective.
 
In doing a search for benevolence from Iraq, I can't find anything. The education system was good for a very short period and began a quick decline when SoDamn Insane announced war against Iran in the 80's. Then, with his invasion of Kuwait, the entire country began to deteriorate very quickly. Imposed sanctions by the UN led to more restrictions on Insane's budget, however Iraq never had more than 6% of its GDP allocated for education. And, when it did crest 6%, it was for only a year or two at best.

And, while his right hand man was a Christian, I don't think the world can forget what a tyrant he was and how the citizens of Iraq feared him. The history of this man's reign produces nothing but evil, assassinations of anyone who remotely opposed him, genocide against his own people and all of this for oil, wealth and power.

He led his country to attack his neighboring countries and brought the demise upon himself and his citizens. Yes, I am certain, there are some Iraqis who revere him. There are many who did not. I am not posting this to defend anyone, but simply so the other side is remembered.

Saddam Hussein was an evil man. Period. This cannot be refuted.


http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/30/world/middleeast/30saddam.html?_r=1&pagewanted=2

Countries that spend the most on education

[ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_Iraq]Education in Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
nah the schools were great. Iraq was a paradise.

It's over now so why all the fuss?
 
While we can't defend the invasion led by the United States, we absolutely cannot defend the actions of SoDamn Insane against the people of Iraq or that anything he did was for the good of those people. That's la-la land for certain.
 
In doing a search for benevolence from Iraq, I can't find anything. The education system was good for a very short period and began a quick decline when SoDamn Insane announced war against Iran in the 80's. Then, with his invasion of Kuwait, the entire country began to deteriorate very quickly. Imposed sanctions by the UN led to more restrictions on Insane's budget, however Iraq never had more than 6% of its GDP allocated for education. And, when it did crest 6%, it was for only a year or two at best.

And, while his right hand man was a Christian, I don't think the world can forget what a tyrant he was and how the citizens of Iraq feared him. The history of this man's reign produces nothing but evil, assassinations of anyone who remotely opposed him, genocide against his own people and all of this for oil, wealth and power.

He led his country to attack his neighboring countries and brought the demise upon himself and his citizens. Yes, I am certain, there are some Iraqis who revere him. There are many who did not. I am not posting this to defend anyone, but simply so the other side is remembered.

Saddam Hussein was an evil man. Period. This cannot be refuted.

I was adressing the possibility of secular states with large Muslim population. It wasn't an endorsement of Saddam, although at this point we're supposed to be pulling for Iraq, at least I think. [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_secularism]Islam and secularism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame] Saddam belonged to the Baath party which is mentioned in the article. [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baath_Party]Ba'ath Party - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
What is the justification for the folks burning construction equipment and vandalizing a mosque FAR from Ground Zero or any events connected to 9-11?
 
I was adressing the possibility of secular states with large Muslim population. It wasn't an endorsement of Saddam, although at this point we're supposed to be pulling for Iraq, at least I think. Islam and secularism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Saddam belonged to the Baath party which is mentioned in the article. Ba'ath Party - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I understand completely your point, but it's hard for me to grasp that Hussein was a true proponent of secularism. Was it a facade? Because there was so much oppression with his 'freedom.' You know?
 
I understand completely your point, but it's hard for me to grasp that Hussein was a true proponent of secularism. Was it a facade? Because there was so much oppression with his 'freedom.' You know?

I don't think he was a big proponent. I think he personally was not a fundamentalist and I don't think he gave such issues a lot of priority. It sound like the Baath party has it's roots in Naziism, so yes he was very oppressive. Still, I often think places like Saudi Arabia have got to be at least as oppressive if not more so.
 
I don't think he was a big proponent. I think he personally was not a fundamentalist and I don't think he gave such issues a lot of priority. It sound like the Baath party has it's roots in Naziism, so yes he was very oppressive. Still, I often think places like Saudi Arabia have got to be at least as oppressive if not more so.

Without a doubt. But, they are smart to maintain global relations despite restricting their borders.
 
What is the justification for the folks burning construction equipment and vandalizing a mosque FAR from Ground Zero or any events connected to 9-11?
First I've heard about it, and probably cannot justify it if it's true. Those damn Americans are always burning sh_t. Football games, basket ball games, trials with the wrong verdict, mosque building, damn building, road building, prankster/gangsta, and so on.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top