• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Redfish Village Beach Access

New posts
SJ-What are we all arguing about then? Heck the realtor knows you can put PrivateBA why can't we accept it? She might want to reconsider what she post on the sight. I am going to go buy the lot and hold on to it. Developers will eat this lot up if PrivateBA is accepted next to it.

So we are now going to have PrivateBA next to each other. I feel sorry for the land around these PrivateBA developments.

Looks like the Trailer Park needs to buy if it is already zoned for this type of use. Should we call it Lot 3?
Maybe the seller of 248 Blue Mtn Road doesn't want the private access next to his property because he wanted Redfish Village to buy his house instead. :idontno::floor:
 
Many important points have been expressed here....some, not so important.
The reality for this project is this, you don't promise buyers something in condominium documents that you aren't prepared to deliver....before the shovel ever hits the ground.
When they drew up the docs, they didn't know that this would be a problem. Development takes time and not all is guaranteed. That is why the buyers have the right to receive their money returned without penalty if the developer doesn't deliver what was promised.
 
Many important points have been expressed here....some, not so important.
The reality for this project is this, you don't promise buyers something in condominium documents that you aren't prepared to deliver....before the shovel ever hits the ground.

nowgirl did they promise East Lot 1 or West Lot 2? Not sure what the Condo Docs look like. Would love to see them.
 
Last edited:
When they drew up the docs, they didn't know that this would be a problem. Development takes time and not all is guaranteed. That is why the buyers have the right to receive their money returned without penalty if the developer doesn't deliver what was promised.

SJ-Looks like we need to create a Thread for contract holders.
 
I didn't see the docs....but the state will have them on file.
SJ... The developers should have never assumed obtaining access would not be a problem if they knew in advance that they would
be creating this access through residential lots???
 
Did those brochures not have that fine print that I have seen on so many pre-construction brochures "need not be built" or something to that effect in really small print somewhere?
 
I didn't see the docs....but the state will have them on file.
SJ... The developers should have never assumed obtaining access would not be a problem if they knew in advance that they would
be creating this access through residential lots???
I am not saying that the were smart in doing so, but as the developer, they have the right to try to get a private access approved and advertise it as such if they act in good faith to go through with it. As stated before, they have spent somewhere around $9 million to try to make it happen. They do appear to be trying to act in good faith, and if they cannot make it happen, buyers may be entitled to a full refund. I am not taking sides with Redfish Village, just providing some basic facts associated with pre-construction sales.
 
Agreed....but I think that would be 9 million plus construction/land costs for the project....don't even want to guess at that number!!:shock: :shock:
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top