Let me come out of lurk mode to comment from a renters point of view, having just rented through Beachseekers. While everything went well on our vacation, I felt violated when I received the first Beachseekers invoice that was more than 35% higher than the cost of the rental. Tax, "reservation fee," cleaning fee, insurance, "convenience fee" ? all were added on and totaled, as I said, more than a 35% surcharge. As cottage owners, I'm sure you can argue the validity of all of those fees. However, as a customer, that was a nasty surprise.
My family and I have rented houses for the last dozen or so years in different parts of the country and have always found pricing to be much more upfront. Additionally, cleaning fees are usually included in the cost of the rental (except for excessive damage), a "reservation fee" is pure BS (it's the homeowner's choice to use a reservation service), and a "convenience fee" (which turns out to be a credit card surcharge) needs to be spelled out ahead of time giving the renter the option of paying using a check, money order or whatever.
Anyhow, as one of your potential customers, I'd ask that you make sure your management company presents the property and its costs in an honest, upfront way.
Additional Fees. A non-refundable administration fee of $60.00 will be charged to all reservations. A housekeeping fee will be applied to all reservations, with the amount depending on the size of the property.
Taxes. A total of 11% tax will be collected on all rentals, 7% local tax and 4% bed tax.
Based on research I've been doing, they appear to generate far more owner income than other major rental companies in the area. Of the three I've tracked (Ocean Reef, Sandcastles, and Beaches of South Walton) Ocean Reef has the highest occupancy rates but also the highest fees, BOSW has the lowest occupancy rates and the highest rental rates, while Sandcastle has reasonable rates with the lowest fees. Sandcastles matches OR in terms of internet coverage, while SC's web experience far surpases OR's. BOSW has a poor web experience, but higher rates, giving them second place in terms of owner revenue.
In terms of owner income, based on my research, they rate -
1) SC
2) BOSW
3) OR
SC is growing in popularity though so there's no telling how well they'll do down the road.
You have to be carefully when looking at these variables because I know for a fact that in our neighborhood the homes that are listed with them are occupied but only because the owners have been filling the weeks not SC.
Yes I've noticed that as well. Though I have had a couple friends that switched from OR to SC "claim" better occupancy and income. I can't confirm that as I've not seen the numbers. In general most everyone I meet who works with them is quite happy with the service.

