South Walton Fire District Races

[seagrovegirl]

Division of Elections-Department of State Booklet for candidates;

Campaign Advertising: What information must be included on a political disclaimer?
Political advertisement paid by the candidate:
"Political advertisement paid for and approved by (name of candidate) (party affiliation) ( office sought)

For more disclaimer examples see http://election.dos.state.fl.us/pdf/adHandout.pdf

 

[grumpyfish]

Thank you for the info. I want you to know that I'm sorry if I seemed like I was gunning for you. I was not. I just dislike it when politicians use underhanded tactics. I hold nothing against SWFD of which you're a part of. It is a fine organization. I just want to keep it that way and I know you do too.

 

[Bob Wells]

Vote Thurston and Kazek
The other candidates have started slinging mud.
Jack got your email, you should try less spin and be more straight forward.

 

[DuneLaker]

I'll be voting for Wright and Abbit. They are the most qualified and are proven board members who are for the common citizens of South Walton. I found it quite disturbing a few weeks ago when certain individuals were voicing untrue remarks about these two fine men.

 

[Bob Wells]

Curious what were the untrue remarks.

 

[DuneLaker]

Be careful what you ask for. I have been generous in not saying more specifically who said it. Furthermore, it is often better not to repeat untrue statements.

 

[Interested Girl]

So as the soon to be Republican State Committeewoman you are publicly stating that you do not agree with the endorsements voted on by the Executive committee. Did you attend that meeting that was reported earlier.

We should expect a unified story from our leadership. What you do in the voting booth is your business, but what you say here reflects upon you leadership ability.

Lord help us.

 

[Lois Lane1]

So as the soon to be Republican State Committeewoman you are publicly stating that you do not agree with the endorsements voted on by the Executive committee. Did you attend that meeting that was reported earlier.

We should expect a unified story from our leadership. What you do in the voting booth is your business, but what you say here reflects upon you leadership ability.

Lord help us.

I would love to hear the untrue remarks. Check with the supervisor of elections for candidates party affiliation. Mr. Wright is a good candidate. On the other hand, Mr Abbit was a democrat who recently changed to republican to try and get their endorsement. As a lifelong republican I would hope our leadership has better judgement than to vote for such a candidate. I would hope the Executive committee of our party does not hold the same views.

 

[The Watcher]

Watcher weighs in

For what it is worth, the Watcher likes Thurston in this race. As I understand it, those who respond to the actual 911 Calls for Fire and Help (aka the fire department) like Thurston too.

1 + 1 = 2 No brainer.

w

 

[seagrovegirl]

So as the soon to be Republican State Committeewoman you are publicly stating that you do not agree with the endorsements voted on by the Executive committee. Did you attend that meeting that was reported earlier.

We should expect a unified story from our leadership. What you do in the voting booth is your business, but what you say here reflects upon you leadership ability.

Lord help us.

You obviously have a twisted perception of group endorsements. My perception is that I am thankful that elected officials have the right to think for themselves, this is a democracy, you know.

Endorsements are determined by a group, then voted on. Not everyone in the group gets the endorsement of the candidate they prefer. There is no law or anything unethical about Dunelaker making choices she is comfortable with. It would scare me if she voted to follow the herd.