• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

The ultimate humiliation of the infidel

New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's what's happening at another of the 9/11 sites.

Why did no one object to the "Pentagon mosque"? - War Room - Salon.com

Navy imam Chaplain Abuhena M. Saifulislam lifted his voice to God as he called to prayer more than 100 Department of Defense employees Monday at a celebration of Ramadan at the Pentagon.

God is most great, sang the lieutenant commander and Islamic leader, in Arabic, as iftar ? the end of the daily fast began.

Uniformed military personnel, civilians and family members faced Mecca and knelt on adorned prayer rugs chanting their prayers in quiet invocation to Allah.
 
A Mosque at 9/11 ?Ground Zero??
by Brigitte Gabriel

"Imagine the American response in 1950 if the Japanese government sought to erect a shrine to its World War II Emperor in Pearl Harbor, right next to the sunken wreckage of the USS Arizona.

Would 'outrage' be strong enough to describe the response?

Now fast forward to 2010.

Less than nine years after the worst terrorist attack on American soil in our history, an imam who blames America for the 9/11 attack wants to construct a 13 story, $100 million dollar mosque and Islamic center 600 feet from 'Ground Zero.'

And he wants to unveil it to the world on September 11, 2011 ? the ten year anniversary of the greatest jihadist atrocity ever perpetrated against America on its own soil.

News and blog sites across the country are heating up over this. ACT! for America, the nation?s largest grassroots organization dedicated to combating radical Islam and global jihad, today launched a national petition opposing the mosque, which says in part:


'We are opposed to the grotesque symbolism represented by the building of this mosque at ?ground zero?? We are deeply disturbed by the insensitivity to the families of the victims of the 9/11 jihadist attack exhibited by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and his supporters.'


As a measure of the public?s outrage , over 5,000 people had signed the petition in the first three hours.

Families of the victims of 9/11 are stunned by the news that this mosque is proceeding ahead. It does not appear to be the mosque per se, but the audacity of those pushing for it to be located on what one firefighter survivor described as 'sacred ground,' that is striking a nerve.

Debra Burlingame, the sister of the American Airlines pilot whose jet was hijacked and flown into the Pentagon, is the founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe and Strong America. In a recent Fox News interview she said:


'"The idea that you would establish a religious institution that embraces the very Shariah Law that terrorists point to as their justification for what they did ? to build that where almost 3,000 people died, that is an obscenity to me."'


The views of the imam of the proposed mosque are also roiling the waters. Madeline Brooks, an ACT! for America chapter leader in Manhattan, wrote the following recently in American Thinker:


'During a recent Friday sermon, this writer did due diligence as a mosque monitor and heard Rauf deny that Muslims perpetrated 9/11. In an interview with CNN shortly after 9/11, Rauf said, ?U.S. policies were an accessory to the crime that happened. We [the U.S.] have been an accessory to a lot of innocent lives dying in the world. Osama bin Laden was made in the USA.? Elsewhere, Rauf has stated that terrorism will end only when the West acknowledges the harm it has done to Muslims. And that it was Christians who started mass attacks on civilians.'


New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg has said that if it?s legal to put a mosque at this site, then it should be allowed. But 'legal' and 'right' are not necessarily the same thing.

For years Americans have been lectured to by Islamist leaders and their enablers and supporters about how Americans must be more sensitive to the needs, customs, and sensibilities of Muslims.

But one would be hard-pressed to find something more insensitive than the placement of a mosque, whose imam supports Islamic sharia law, right next to the worst Islamic jihadist attack on American soil in history.

The fact that the imam behind this mosque claims locating the mosque here is intended to heal the wounds of 9/11 reveals either moral obtuseness or disingenuousness.

The Muslim world is all about symbolism. To the militant Islamist in Saudi Arabia, a mosque at ground zero would represent the ultimate in humiliation of the infidel.

To the families of the victims of 9/11, it is the ultimate slap in the face."
Posted by Debra Moore at 10:54 PM
the first sentence shows the mind of the writer. pure fantasy..... it's a christian redneck's wet dream
 
Oh Sammy,it's o.k dude,it's just the internet,I don't take any of it seriously.:lol:
I am sorry to come along and pee pee in your sandbox.I know it must be difficult to accept someone with differing views from yours and your buddies here but that is what makes diversity among Americans so important,you know,that whole "tolerance" and "acceptance" thing.Hypocrisy stinks a joint up(bad pun,I know) so lets try to be civil to one another,instead of being a-holes to one another.Cool?
what would you do if your thinking was allowed to be acted upon? seriously, what would you do to make things right for you?
 
the first sentence shows the mind of the writer. pure fantasy..... it's a christian redneck's wet dream

You never seem to miss an opportunity to bash Christianity. God bless you..
 
IMHO, Bloomberg got it right. I bolded part of it - funny how so-called defenders of the Constitution accuse people of being left-leaning when they support Constitutional freedoms they don't agree with.


Mayor Michael Bloomberg's remarks as delivered on Governors Island:"We have come here to Governors Island to stand where the earliest settlers first set foot in New Amsterdam, and where the seeds of religious tolerance were first planted. We've come here to see the inspiring symbol of liberty that, more than 250 years later, would greet millions of immigrants in the harbor, and we come here to state as strongly as ever ? this is the freest city in the world. That's what makes New York special and different and strong.
"Our doors are open to everyone ? everyone with a dream and a willingness to work hard and play by the rules. New York City was built by immigrants, and it is sustained by immigrants ? by people from more than a hundred different countries speaking more than two hundred different languages and professing every faith. And whether your parents were born here, or you came yesterday, you are a New Yorker.
"We may not always agree with every one of our neighbors. That's life and it's part of living in such a diverse and dense city. But we also recognise that part of being a New Yorker is living with your neighbors in mutual respect and tolerance. It was exactly that spirit of openness and acceptance that was attacked on 9/11.
"On that day, 3,000 people were killed because some murderous fanatics didn't want us to enjoy the freedom to profess our own faiths, to speak our own minds, to follow our own dreams and to live our own lives.
"Of all our precious freedoms, the most important may be the freedom to worship as we wish. And it is a freedom that, even here in a city that is rooted in Dutch tolerance, was hard-won over many years. In the mid-1650s, the small Jewish community living in lower Manhattan petitioned Dutch Governor Peter Stuyvesant for the right to build a synagogue ? and they were turned down.
"In 1657, when Stuyvesant also prohibited Quakers from holding meetings, a group of non-Quakers in Queens signed the Flushing Remonstrance, a petition in defense of the right of Quakers and others to freely practice their religion. It was perhaps the first formal, political petition for religious freedom in the American colonies ? and the organiser was thrown in jail and then banished from New Amsterdam.
"In the 1700s, even as religious freedom took hold in America, Catholics in New York were effectively prohibited from practicing their religion ? and priests could be arrested. Largely as a result, the first Catholic parish in New York City was not established until the 1780's ? St Peter's on Barclay Street, which still stands just one block north of the World Trade Centre site and one block south of the proposed mosque and community centre.
"This morning, the city's Landmark Preservation Commission unanimously voted not to extend landmark status to the building on Park Place where the mosque and community centre are planned. The decision was based solely on the fact that there was little architectural significance to the building. But with or without landmark designation, there is nothing in the law that would prevent the owners from opening a mosque within the existing building. The simple fact is this building is private property, and the owners have a right to use the building as a house of worship.
"The government has no right whatsoever to deny that right ? and if it were tried, the courts would almost certainly strike it down as a violation of the US Constitution. Whatever you may think of the proposed mosque and community center, lost in the heat of the debate has been a basic question ? should government attempt to deny private citizens the right to build a house of worship on private property based on their particular religion? That may happen in other countries, but we should never allow it to happen here. This nation was founded on the principle that the government must never choose between religions, or favor one over another.
"The World Trade Centre Site will forever hold a special place in our City, in our hearts. But we would be untrue to the best part of ourselves ? and who we are as New Yorkers and Americans ? if we said 'no' to a mosque in lower Manhattan.
"Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values ? and play into our enemies' hands ? if we were to treat Muslims differently than anyone else. In fact, to cave to popular sentiment would be to hand a victory to the terrorists ? and we should not stand for that.
"For that reason, I believe that this is an important test of the separation of church and state as we may see in our lifetime ? as important a test ? and it is critically important that we get it right.
"On September 11, 2001, thousands of first responders heroically rushed to the scene and saved tens of thousands of lives. More than 400 of those first responders did not make it out alive. In rushing into those burning buildings, not one of them asked 'What God do you pray to?' 'What beliefs do you hold?'
"The attack was an act of war ? and our first responders defended not only our city but also our country and our Constitution. We do not honour their lives by denying the very Constitutional rights they died protecting. We honour their lives by defending those rights ? and the freedoms that the terrorists attacked.
"Of course, it is fair to ask the organisers of the mosque to show some special sensitivity to the situation ? and in fact, their plan envisions reaching beyond their walls and building an interfaith community. By doing so, it is my hope that the mosque will help to bring our city even closer together and help repudiate the false and repugnant idea that the attacks of 9/11 were in any way consistent with Islam. Muslims are as much a part of our city and our country as the people of any faith and they are as welcome to worship in lower Manhattan as any other group. In fact, they have been worshipping at the site for the better part of a year, as is their right.
"The local community board in lower Manhattan voted overwhelming to support the proposal and if it moves forward, I expect the community centre and mosque will add to the life and vitality of the neighbourhood and the entire city.
"Political controversies come and go, but our values and our traditions endure ? and there is no neighborhood in this city that is off limits to God's love and mercy, as the religious leaders here with us today can attest."
 
where's my answer from the patriot who asks his fellow man to be tolerant of intolerance? talk the talk?
 
Bloomberg is a power crazed nut job.

This is not about religious freedom. There are over 100 mosques in New York. They are free to worship. This is Islam working to destroy our freedom.

"Islam uses the U.S. Constitution to demand the exercise of religious freedom while advocating for Shariah law, which fuses church and state and seeks to subjugate non-Muslims. Islamists are using our freedoms in an effort to destroy our freedoms.

Moreover, much of the $100 million in funding for the mosque is coming from Saudi Arabia. Riyadh has been aggressively supporting the building of madrassas and mosques around the world. The Saudi regime promotes Wahhabism, a particularly virulent strain of Islam. For example, Christian churches and synagogues are banned in Saudi Arabia; religious persecution is rampant. Yet no one - not New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo or any other sanctimonious liberal supporter of the ground-zero mosque - has bothered to investigate the sources of Mr. Rauf's funding. Are Wahhabists behind the mosque? If so, it probably will become a forum for hatred and extremism - just like a Saudi-funded mosque in Northern Virginia where the al-Qaeda-linked cleric Anwar al-Awlaki preached the virtues of jihadism.

Instead of addressing these issues, liberals such as Mr. Bloomberg are wrapping themselves in the flag of religious freedom."
 
Oh Sammy,it's o.k dude,it's just the internet,I don't take any of it seriously.:lol:
I am sorry to come along and pee pee in your sandbox.I know it must be difficult to accept someone with differing views from yours and your buddies here but that is what makes diversity among Americans so important,you know,that whole "tolerance" and "acceptance" thing.Hypocrisy stinks a joint up(bad pun,I know) so lets try to be civil to one another,instead of being a-holes to one another.Cool?

If you're going to preach civility, talk the talk would be a more appropriate moniker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top