• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Walton Sheriff Wants Increase Security

New posts

Jim Tucker

Beach Fanatic
I heard that this was triggered by the recent railings of one "citizen" of Walton County who is known to possess multiple weapons. Whatever the reason probably a good idea.

:

Walton Sheriff Mike Adkinson would like to increase the security at the South Walton Courthouse Annex. Sheriff Adkinson told the Walton Commissioners that in the times we are living in today, we need more vigilance. Sheriff Adkinson said they want everyone to express their views, they want to do so safe.


The Sheriff pointed out a person who was at commissioner meetings eventually shot five people. He feels they would be much better off with consistency. Adkinson would like a system similar to what is in DeFuniak Springs.


While there is additional bailiffs, a metal detector and a scanner that everyone must go through when entering the main courthouse in DeFuniak Springs, the facility south of the bay has no additional security. Bailiffs are present at court and commission events. The building in south Walton was designed primarily as an administrative building. The plans were to build a second court facility to the west. At the time the first building was constructed, commissioners decided to delay the second. Almost as soon as the building was dedicated, space became tight and what was once a commissioner office was taken out to make more room. The courts also expanded into the building. With a tight budget, there are no immediate plans for the second building.


Sheriff Adkinson explained the courthouse and county seat in DeFuniak Springs has security under the judicial system. When the new courthouse as being planned, a security team involving the judges, clerk’s office and other constitutional officers helped come up with security recommendations. Judge Kelvin Wells and Clerk of Courts Martha Ingle both addressed the commissioners and asked for additional security measures. Both cites recent concerns and a shooting at a facility in Panama City.


Sheriff Adkinson asked the commissioners to speak to the constitutional officers about security. He also feels the budget can take on the additional needs. He said his office is expected to come in under budget and feels this could offset the costs.


Adkinson also wants to search for ways to use volunteers to help with those who might need assistance. One idea is to use golf carts to help disabled get from parking to the facility. The idea was also talked about as a way to help at the courthouse in DeFuniak Springs when the County’s ADA committee was looking at how to meet the needs of people with disabilities at the new courthouse.


Commissioners approved moving forth with the additional security.
 
I think it is a good idea to have the same level of security in both locations.

Considering the increase in shootings, it is better to be proactive than reactive.
 
i believe this is another move by the sheriff to strip our second amendment right as u.s. citizens to bear arms. yes another move by a so called republican sheriff, but in reality a lefty, gun control libreal.
 
i believe this is another move by the sheriff to strip our second amendment right as u.s. citizens to bear arms. yes another move by a so called republican sheriff, but in reality a lefty, gun control libreal.

Has our sheriff tried to take away your right to bear arms? Do you feel the need to carry a concealed weapon into a meeting at the county annex? Or were you hoping to enter with a rifle over your shoulder?

I find your post disturbing, but pretty sure it's just a pathetic attempt to make a trite political jab and grind an old axe.

Maybe you'd be kind enough to convince us that you don't want to shoot anyone in particular.
 
I believe I know the individual the initial post is referring to very well and knowing him as I do, I do not believe that is the reason Sheriff Atkinson is asking for the same security at both locations. It is probably a good idea and, festus, no one is trying to take away your 2nd Amendment rights by making sure meetings are as secure as possible.

This is definitely no longer the same nation I grew up in as it is even more violent than it was then. Whether you like to admit it or not, we are the most violent nation in the world. The gun related deaths in Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City for one week usually exceed those related deaths in all of Great Britain for a year. Such is life in the United States these days.
 
It is already illegal under Florida law to bring a firearm into a government building--even if you have a concealed weapons permit. Installing metal detectors to enforce existing law does not constitute a change in the law.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There is a set security protocol for courtrooms that is already in place in our county.
The annex has courtrooms.
Thus, the annex needs to follow the security protocol.

No 2nd amendment issue. (Though I will personally feel safer knowing people had to go through a metal detector. Idiots with guns make us all less safe IMO.)
 
Back when I was in college, I had an internship that shared a building with a branch court office. Even back during the early 90s, security was extremely hard-ass for that court office because of a previous incident where one of the judges in the county was killed in her chambers by her husband in an awful domestic violence incident.
 
i believe this is another move by the sheriff to strip our second amendment right as u.s. citizens to bear arms. yes another move by a so called republican sheriff, but in reality a lefty, gun control libreal.

Too busy cleaning your guns to spell check your lame attempt at insults?
 
It is already illegal under Florida law to bring a firearm into a government building--even if you have a concealed weapons permit. Installing metal detectors to enforce existing law does not constitute a change in the law.
Actually that may not be the case. I am not sure that this article is entirely correct because it seemed that after the legislature passed the concealed weapon law they failed to include themselves in the exclusion and had alarms placed in all the legislators offices. If I can find the article I will post it. Here is one that does allow weapons in government offices.http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/20..._gun-violence-local-firearms-regulations-bans
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top