• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Way to go ST JOE!

New posts

SHELLY

SoWal Insider
St. Joe Co. fined again for RiverTown water violations
Lots of land was cleared for housing that didn't develop; then came runoff

The developer of RiverTown in St. Johns County is being fined for the third time in 13 months for letting silt and mud pour into creeks.

The St. Johns River Water Management District’s governing board said Tuesday the St. Joe Co., one of the state’s largest landowners, should pay $16,105 in fines and costs. Members debated whether the amount was high enough and finally decided to warn the company that any new trouble would be punished more severely.

A management district inspector reported in August that mud and silt from the 4,170-acre development along Florida 13 was pouring into Kendall Creek and Orange Grove Branch, which both flow into the St. Johns River.

Land had been cleared for more roads and lots than construction crews could control, an agency administrator said.

“At the end of the day, I think we were pretty convinced that RiverTown was doing their best to manage the situation. And because of their having cleared so much land, it became an almost impossible job,” said Dale Lovell , a management district compliance manager in Jacksonville.

Runoff from the project made the creeks three to five times cloudier than state law allows, a management district report said.

Sediment in creeks can cover and kill underwater plants and animals.

An activist whose group reported the problem said St. Joe should have been fined more.

“We were told this was going to be an environmentally sensitive community and this is not going to be like any of these other developments,” said St. Johns Riverkeeper Neil Armingeon. “As it turns out, it’s exactly like the other developments.

“They go in, they clear-cut thousands of acres and they don’t control this runoff. … What’s the incentive for St. Joe to do the right thing? There is no incentive.”

Lovell said the management district is also requiring St. Joe to take extra steps to reduce runoff. He said that’s more important than collecting fines.

Jerry Ray, a St. Joe spokesman and senior vice president, said a lot of the ground cleared was because of construction of a county road. The amount of land cleared for buildings “was appropriate with market absorption projections at the time,” Ray wrote by e-mail.

By the last quarter of 2008, St. Joe reported just 30 home sites sold, out of a planned 4,500, and Ray wrote that “sales have not met our expectations.”

Runoff problems were made worse by the collapse of part of a bridge to carry an unfinished road over a creek, Lovell said. A 100-foot-long, 12-foot-high retaining wall on a section of one road collapsed and spilled sediment, he said.

Lovell said removing the sediment was delayed because of a lawsuit about the collapsed wall, but Ray said his company isn’t involved in any suit about that.

St. Joe has been talking with county officials about better ways to handle runoff from storms, Ray wrote.

In an October letter, a St. Joe manager described steps to fix the problem and told the management district the company had been carefully about managing runoff all along.

“This attention to detail has resulted in minimal erosion issues over the past two years of construction,” the director of development, Michael J. Yuro, wrote.

But at that point, the company had already been told twice to control RiverTown’s runoff better.

The first time, in February 2008, the company was ordered to pay about $45,000 to the management district and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. That started with problems during a rainy period in 2007, Lovell said.

Four months later, St. Joe was told to pay about $10,500 over problems that Lovell said started because sediment was running off of land cleared for a large athletic field.
 
This is very sad news!

The fine cannot be stiff enough!..:angry:

They should have to go in and seed/plant - whatever it takes to slow that runoff and it should be done asap!


.
 
St. Joe did something bad for the environment and got a slap on the wrist - good thing I was sitting down for that SHOCKING news! :roll:
 
Okaloosa Co allowed 15,000 cu. yds to flow into my wetlands and DEP did nothing. The rules only apply when convenient and profitable.
 
Joe was caught doing the same thing on Lake Powell in 2007 from the WaterSound north location...they blamed it on a sub and nothing happened to them...
 
St. Joe has been talking with county officials about better ways to handle runoff from storms, [ST JOE Senior Vice President, Jerry] Ray wrote.

...apparently Mr. Ray has been side-tracked by his efforts of lobbying Congress to shut down VPS.

.
 
St. Joe Co. fined again for RiverTown water violations
Lots of land was cleared for housing that didn't develop; then came runoff

Members debated whether the amount was high enough and finally decided to warn the company that any new trouble would be punished more severely.


Lovell said the management district is also requiring St. Joe to take extra steps to reduce runoff. He said that?s more important than collecting fines.


Runoff problems were made worse by the collapse of part of a bridge to carry an unfinished road over a creek, Lovell said. A 100-foot-long, 12-foot-high retaining wall on a section of one road collapsed and spilled sediment, he said.

True story. In the late 80s, TheCompleteSheep was working for a large land owner who decided to build a mall or six. One called the Mid America Mall, in Memphis

<aside; Memphis is a wunnerful town that I have submitted to the N. Koreans as Targeto Uno Ono>

Mr. Large Landowner decided he need some fill and scooped his scoops into the Nonatchagohnnareahelaia whatever River, a run-to the Mississippi. Whilst dredging, the bridge downstream collapsed - :yikes:- in midday killing 10, 348, er, a few peoples. One was a young girl with a baby. Along come the lawsuits.

Years and millions of legal $$$$$ later, Mr. Large Landowner was found innocent.

<whirling back the time clock to pre-scooping>

TCS: Mr. LL, if you dig up here, the NNNNwhatever River will run faster, there maybe debris buildup, maybe....

MLL: "You're fired".

The End.
 
Nice to hear from TheSheep. I'm tellin' you SoWal.com, there is something there.
Aside from the potential up/downstream consequences, one item in the St. Joe revelation that rankles ewe is the pseudo-greening of RiverTown. They tie in with the Guava Tomato Macaroni Estuary, throw up a picture of a braindead, flowered pre-menstrual (soo cute, isn't hers?) and Whoosh - environmentalitis sensitivitus maximus.

<projectile vomiting>

Will peeps buy?
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top