• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.

Weiners

New posts
Interesting benefits to retaining a law firm to do your investigating.

1. It invokes client / attorney priviledge so the law firm cannot be compelled to release any info that they find.

2. He made or filed a claim to law enforcement that his computer was hacked. If he let the law do the investigation and if they found that he was spouting BS, he would, then, be on the hook for making a false claim which may be a felony.

The late night hosts are having a total field day with this talking about Member Weiner and how he should lighten up and not be so "stiff" about it all. John Stewart said he could tell that the guy definitely leaned to the left! HA HA HA HA HA!!!
The last paragraph is hilarious. :floor:
 
Interesting benefits to retaining a law firm to do your investigating.

1. It invokes client / attorney priviledge so the law firm cannot be compelled to release any info that they find.

2. He made or filed a claim to law enforcement that his computer was hacked. If he let the law do the investigation and if they found that he was spouting BS, he would, then, be on the hook for making a false claim which may be a felony.

The late night hosts are having a total field day with this talking about Member Weiner and how he should lighten up and not be so "stiff" about it all. John Stewart said he could tell that the guy definitely leaned to the left! HA HA HA HA HA!!!

lol, I really do need to turn on the tv.
 
Weiner, wiener, weener...

Tomato, tomahto...

His best statement so far has been that he's not sure if it's him or not. I'm not sure about the rest of you, but I would remember taking cadid shots of my Congressional "member" and what kind of underwear I have. That was probably a bit more damning than he first thought...
 
Seriously - all he had to say was "I didn't take/pose for that picture, I did not send it via twitter, and if that IS a picture of me, I am going to sue them for invasion of privacy!"

Covers all bases.
 
The real issue here is that it's not one. I'll bet it probably is his, but he should just lie about it and say it's not his. He's not under oath or even under investigation. No crimes or breaches of ethics have been committed. He's no Bill O'Reilly. He's simply made a fool out of himself.
 
Seriously - all he had to say was "I didn't take/pose for that picture, I did not send it via twitter, and if that IS a picture of me, I am going to sue them for invasion of privacy!"

Covers all bases.

The problem is he made a statement that he had been hacked, and there is a mandated Congressional process that has to be followed to deal with hacking. So far, that has not been done.
 
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top