
Since we have determined we are discussing those that have the means to travel and don't, which honestly I was not sure we were discussing that at first.
I don't know that we were ever discussing those don't have the means to travel, not traveling. That tangent was really confusing me.
The whole point of the article (which I don't think most people read) was that for our income levels we travel less and a significantly smaller part of our population has a passport.
For example, 60% of Canadians have passports. Many of the same geographic and financial limitations (international airfare etc.) and vast opportunities for intra-country travel cited for Americans also apply to them.
I think ANY travel is good - whether it's to the next block, the next town, the next state, or the next country, but many Americans do not and are very hesitant to go outside their bubble or comfort zone.
I have been appalled by other guests at destination weddings who basically see the airport, hotel, church and reception site - even when they are still in the US and have time to kill.
More than 35% of Americans don't even use all their vacation days.
It's not about who can afford what, it's about what people choose to do and what they value.
No, I visited there years ago and now have no need to EVER return.Sounds like you might have the Destin Wal-Mart on your destination list. :funn:

No, I visited there years ago and now have no need to EVER return.
See, travel is broadening.![]()
One way to make this happen if you can't afford the full family vacation would be to save up for a two month Europe trek for your kids to take after their second year of college. Both my sister and I did this during school. The trip was cheap compared to what a family vacation would cost. We both stayed in cheap hostels and bought a europass six months in advance. The most expensive part of my trip was the flight over and back, which ran around $1000.00. Beyond that I probably only spent another thousand dollars or so. Quite the experience for a kid that age too. Just hope you raised them right so they don't come home an expecting mother or father.![]()
, I find that with limited time for vacation, traveling hours on a plane, the running around to museums and sites, it can be exhausting for even the healthiest of people. When we have limited time off, we want to plant our butts on a beach. I don't know that we were ever discussing those don't have the means to travel, not traveling. That tangent was really confusing me.
The whole point of the article (which I don't think most people read) was that for our income levels we travel less and a significantly smaller part of our population has a passport.
For example, 60% of Canadians have passports. Many of the same geographic and financial limitations (international airfare etc.) and vast opportunities for intra-country travel cited for Americans also apply to them.
I think ANY* travel is good - whether it's to the next block, the next town, the next state, or the next country, but many Americans do not and are very hesitant to go outside their bubble or comfort zone.
I have been appalled by other guests at destination weddings who basically see the airport, hotel, church and reception site - even when they are still in the US and have time to kill.
More than 35% of Americans don't even use all their vacation days.
It's not about who can afford what, it's about what people choose to do and what they value.
*Yes, anywhere - even the bad places like Wal-mart
