30ashopper
SoWal Insider
Democrats, for their part, are also running scared, proposing to keep all the tax cuts except those affecting the very rich. But they were opposed to these tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. If they were a bad idea when budget deficits were small, why are tax cuts a good idea when deficits are around $1.3 trillion?
The idea that the average American is overtaxed is a nice piece of populist pandering. In fact, federal taxes as a percentage of the economy are at their lowest level since the Truman administration. Chuck Marr and Gillian Brunet of the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities have calculated that a family of four at the exact middle of the income spectrum will pay only 4.6 percent of its income in taxes. Remember, almost half of the country pays no income taxes at all. The top 2 percent of Americans contribute almost 50 percent of federal income taxes.
The simple facts are these: All of the Bush tax cuts were unaffordable. They were an irresponsible act of hubris enacted during an economic boom. Conservatives thought they would force us to shrink the government. But with Republicans controlling the White House and both houses of Congress, did reduced taxes cause reduced spending? No. They led to ever-increasing borrowing and a ballooning deficit.
washingtonpost.com
I don't agree with him that the problem is a lack of revenue, but this is the first time I've read a prominent democrat calling for all the tax cuts to expire. You would think more dems would take this position, after all, Zakaria is right, dems were against all the cuts, even those for low incomes, back in 2001.
If dems want to spend like crazy, they need to fund it, and that means taxes need to go up across the board. The rich don't make enough money on total to cover all this new spending. The middle and lower income groups must be forced to pitch in too.
