drivingthru
Beach Comber
I am confused. Chief Adkinson says the vehicle was stopped (in his post to this thread) and Lt Gandy says the pursuing officer broke off to go to the accident. Does anyone know which, or both, are accurate? Also, who was the State Agency that was following the vehicle in the first place? I believe that to be a very crucial part of the puzzle. If they were following the vehicle because they had reason to believe it was transporting narcotics, is one thing. But if they were following the vehicle beacuse the driver was a known dealer and they were just looking for a reason to stop him that is another ball game all together. Does anyone know? Never the less, its over now and thank God everyone is OK.

