• Trouble logging in? Send us a message with your username and/or email address for help.
  • Hello all! We will be performing a website & forum update soon. You may get logged out so now is the time to make sure your email address in your account is correct - go to your account to check it and update it now. Send us a message with your username and/or email address if you need help.

Brannon guilty on ethics charges

New posts
"Arcane piece of triviality"? You either have huge commendable sense of humor, or you're an idiot:idontno:

People, people...have we learned nothing? Miss Kitty is losing her patience and you do not want that to happen. Pssssss.
 
No, he just lied on his financials which is a criminal offense. If he would do this, what else will he do?

How did you reach the conclusions this was a "criminal" offense?

Sounds like to me you are just too happy to see Comm. Brannon receiving bad press. No suggestion of criminal wrongdoing has been made.

As I said a couple of days ago, it appeared the Sun was wrong in its report, and in fact they published a correction.

If you have facts, bring them to the table, if not, lets keep the rhetoric toned down.
 
Good gravy, forget about the local implications, the IRS is going to be visiting him soon!

Similar to my other post, how do you reach that conclusion. I haven't seen any information relating to IRS problems.

The financial disclosure rules are meant to help find out conflicts of interest, at least that's what I have heard.

Let me be clear, if Comm. Brannon was wrong in his filings, intentionally or not, then that should be a concern. It looks as though his errors was resolved with an amended filing (thanks Aggie for posting the joint stipulation document).

Lets keep to the facts guys. No need to make statements about crimes and tax issues if there is nothing about that involved.
 
Similar to my other post, how do you reach that conclusion. I haven't seen any information relating to IRS problems.

The financial disclosure rules are meant to help find out conflicts of interest, at least that's what I have heard.

Let me be clear, if Comm. Brannon was wrong in his filings, intentionally or not, then that should be a concern. It looks as though his errors was resolved with an amended filing (thanks Aggie for posting the joint stipulation document).

Lets keep to the facts guys. No need to make statements about crimes and tax issues if there is nothing about that involved.


You have artfully stated what my somewhat failed attempts at a humorous/tougue in cheek response were meant to convey. BRAVO!:clap:
 
We have an ethical practices problem in our county. Deliberate omissions of required disclosure data are not trivial nor are they political. They are surface indicators of a more serious disregard for the law. If a sitting county commissioner can't remember what his assets are, then he is incompetent and should not be representing us. If he can remember those assets but doesn't disclose them, then he is lying and should not be representing us.

The legal document says: "11. Respondent violated Article IL Section 8(a) and (i) of the Florida Constitution.. and Section 112.3144. Florida Statutes. by failing to properly complete his CE Form 6; Full and Public Disclosure of Financial interests, for calendar years 2003 and 200-5 and failing to timely file and properly complete his CE Form 6 for calendar year 2006.
1Z. Respondent admits the allegation as set forth in paragraph four (4) of the Stipulated Findings of Fact, above."

We deserve better from our representatives.
 
Last edited:
New posts


Sign Up for SoWal Newsletter












                               
Back
Top