Why fix something that is not broken? It cost a lot of money in researching a rebrand. BP broke our economy in 2010 and caused damage to many elements of marketing thus making the rebrand more "necessary". But for the spill our local economy would have rebounded in 2010 without changing a thing because we have a "special" place. I do not get paid the big bucks to figure out a marketing strategy but I am very sure that our pristine resources was being marketed by everyone who ever visited the Beaches of South Walton. So, my point is to "protect" our resource from the Gulf drilling monsters not promoting their culture of abuse which is what we are doing when you thank BP for "anything" or advertise their propaganda of good will.
For TDC to thank BP is counterproductive to the longevity of our coastal paradise. Once the money is all spent what then? Have we not learned that BP has used our paradise as a great experiment? One more massive oil spill like that and all the rebranding and marketing strategy will not bring tourist or anyone else to our local economy. We can recover from hurricanes but should we have learned anything from the Exxon Valdez? This should be a sensitive subject to all of us. I am having a hard time understanding why it is not.
For TDC to thank BP is counterproductive to the longevity of our coastal paradise. Once the money is all spent what then? Have we not learned that BP has used our paradise as a great experiment? One more massive oil spill like that and all the rebranding and marketing strategy will not bring tourist or anyone else to our local economy. We can recover from hurricanes but should we have learned anything from the Exxon Valdez? This should be a sensitive subject to all of us. I am having a hard time understanding why it is not.
