For those who like to share

[PoppaJ]

actions speak louder than words. a person can say they can do a lot of things but then in reality they just wind up sounding like a broken record. In fact, a person does this. I’ve seen it. We all have.

A broken record indeed so I leave that task to you.
I will concentrate on the important differences.

 

[PoppaJ]

So based on witness interviews of top former Justice Department officials trump directly asked the Justice Department nine times to undermine the election result, and his chief of staff Mark Meadows broke administration policy by pressuring a Justice Department lawyer to investigate claims of election fraud.
I’m tried to “BOTH SIDES” this, but I just couldn’t find anything to support it. Maybe next time.

 

[Lake View Too]

Unfortunately both political parties are oppressors and abusers of power. Right now the republican party is ahead in that category and the reason why I vote against. Over spending is a serious problem. Under taxing the wealthy is a serious problem. Elite wealth is a huge inequality and both democrats and republicans are guilty. Democracy will solve these and the many other problems as we debate the issues but we have almost lost our democracy because neither "side" accepts anything from the other side. We are all guilty of this. If we don't stop the nonsense of sides then we can kiss our democracy goodbye forever...

You keep filling your word count with these dreams of “ no sides” and that is simply fantasy. There are always at least two sides to every issue. When one side maintains, without any proof, that there was widespread voter fraud, what is an informed, intelligent person suppose to do? Should he say “yes, perhaps you are correct. Let’s meet in the middle.” Or should he say “no, the facts demonstrate there you are wrong.” Choosing right from wrong isn’t even a choice. Accepting reality is simply what a decent, sane individual must do in life.

 

[mputnal]

You keep filling your word count with these dreams of “ no sides” and that is simply fantasy. There are always at least two sides to every issue. When one side maintains, without any proof, that there was widespread voter fraud, what is an informed, intelligent person suppose to do? Should he say “yes, perhaps you are correct. Let’s meet in the middle.” Or should he say “no, the facts demonstrate there you are wrong.” Choosing right from wrong isn’t even a choice. Accepting reality is simply what a decent, sane individual must do in life.

We say "no, the facts demonstrate that you are wrong" and "accepting reality is honorable". Then we say (Poppaj will love this) "Let's honor God by accepting facts and reality instead of alternative facts and alternative realities"

 

[PoppaJ]

We say "no, the facts demonstrate that you are wrong" and "accepting reality is honorable". Then we say (Poppaj will love this) "Let's honor God by accepting facts and reality instead of alternative facts and alternative realities"

If there was a god there would be no trump or MAGAts

 

[mputnal]

If there was a god there would be no trump or MAGAts

LOL again. What would god do with trump or people who are easily fooled because of corrupt politics? Better yet lets assume you are god or at least someone with a lot of power what would you do with trump and his loyal followers? Give your answer some serious thought before responding.

 

[PoppaJ]

LOL again. What would god do with trump or people who are easily fooled because of corrupt politics? Better yet lets assume you are god or at least someone with a lot of power what would you do with trump and his loyal followers? Give your answer some serious thought before responding.

Can’t be something that doesn’t exist.

 

[mputnal]

Can’t be something that doesn’t exist.

Were you a punter on a football team

 

[Lake View Too]

We say "no, the facts demonstrate that you are wrong" and "accepting reality is honorable". Then we say (Poppaj will love this) "Let's honor God by accepting facts and reality instead of alternative facts and alternative realities"

I believe that is what Democrats and sensible Republicans are doing: telling Fox-washed Trumpers to accept reality. I'm not sure why you feel compelled to inject your theory of God into this. Again, this is not choosing sides. This is as fundamental as breathing. If anyone is choosing sides, it is the people who choose to believe lies instead of the overwhelming preponderance of facts. (People that put all their faith in God, are punting their responsibility to seek justice in this life. "This is God's plan" they say. No, it's not. Other than the infinite beauty of nature, every bit of goodness and evil in the world were created by human beings.)

 

[mputnal]

I believe that is what Democrats and sensible Republicans are doing: telling Fox-washed Trumpers to accept reality. I'm not sure why you feel compelled to inject your theory of God into this. Again, this is not choosing sides. This is as fundamental as breathing. If anyone is choosing sides, it is the people who choose to believe lies instead of the overwhelming preponderance of facts. (People that put all their faith in God, are punting their responsibility to seek justice in this life. "This is God's plan" they say. No, it's not. Other than the infinite beauty of nature, every bit of goodness and evil in the world were created by human beings.)

Interesting. "Every bit of goodness and evil in the world were created by human beings", "other than the infinite beauty of nature". So humans have potential for goodness and evil while nature is only goodness and beauty. Does nature have a conscience?