JB
Beach Fanatic
I don't know. With the new 12-game schedule starting next year, everyone is going to play their share of patsies. Alabama's non-conference slate next year is pathetic. I realize you can't play USC and Oklahoma every week, but with four non-conference games instead of three, everyone in the SEC needs to play one tough non-conference game.
As for the AU/FSU thing, my understanding is AU bought out the final game (two games?) of the series (at Tuberville's request). I didn't agree with it, and I think it made AU look bad, but that was a decision made by Tuberville and Housel.
AU did well to play Tech this year, and UT plays Notre Dame this weekend. Bama played Oklahoma a couple years ago and UF plays FSU every year. Yes, you are risking a loss by scheduling a strong non-conference opponent, but IMO, the advantages in recruiting and national exposure far outweigh the risk of losing the game.
As for the AU/FSU thing, my understanding is AU bought out the final game (two games?) of the series (at Tuberville's request). I didn't agree with it, and I think it made AU look bad, but that was a decision made by Tuberville and Housel.
AU did well to play Tech this year, and UT plays Notre Dame this weekend. Bama played Oklahoma a couple years ago and UF plays FSU every year. Yes, you are risking a loss by scheduling a strong non-conference opponent, but IMO, the advantages in recruiting and national exposure far outweigh the risk of losing the game.


,big birds, or bridges!